Classifying Turbulent Environments via Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of classifying turbulent environments from partial observation is key for some theoretical and applied fields, from engineering to earth observation and astrophysics, e.g. to precondition searching of optimal control policies in different turbulent backgrounds, to predict the probability of rare events and/or to infer physical parameters labelling different turbulent set-ups. To achieve such goal one can use different tools depending on the system's knowledge and on the quality and quantity of the accessible data. In this context, we assume to work in a model-free setup completely blind to all dynamical laws, but with a large quantity of (good quality) data for training. As a prototype of complex flows with different attractors, and different multi-scale statistical properties we selected 10 turbulent 'ensembles' by changing the rotation frequency of the frame of reference of the 3d domain and we suppose to have access to a set of partial observations limited to the instantaneous kinetic energy distribution in a 2d plane, as it is often the case in geophysics and astrophysics. We compare results obtained by a Machine Learning (ML) approach consisting of a state-of-the-art Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) against Bayesian inference which exploits the information on velocity and enstrophy moments. First, we discuss the supremacy of the ML approach, presenting also results at changing the number of training data and of the hyper-parameters. Second, we present an ablation study on the input data aimed to perform a ranking on the importance of the flow features used by the DCNN, helping to identify the main physical contents used by the classifier. Finally, we discuss the main limitations of such data-driven methods and potential interesting applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2022.
Builds on
18 of 83 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,424
- 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
- 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
- 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
- 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
- 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 137
- 2018Generative Probabilistic Novelty Detection with Adversarial Autoencoderscited by 99
- 2020On Learning Sets of Symmetric Elementscited by 97
- 2020Combining data assimilation and machine learning to emulate a dynamical model from sparse and noisy observations: a case study with the Lorenz 96 modelcited by 72
6 more
- 2019A review on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 65
- 2017Flow Navigation by Smart Microswimmers via Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2020Using Machine Learning to Augment Coarse-Grid Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulationscited by 24
- 2019Zermelo's problem: Optimal point-to-point navigation in 2D turbulent flows using Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2020Reconstruction of turbulent data with deep generative models for semantic inpainting from TURB-Rot databasecited by 17
- 2020TURB-Rot. A large database of 3d and 2d snapshots from turbulent rotating flowscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.