mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Deep Neural Networks be Converted to Ultra Low-Latency Spiking Neural Networks?

arXiv 2112.12133 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2021cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spiking neural networks (SNNs), that operate via binary spikes distributed over time, have emerged as a promising energy efficient ML paradigm for resource-constrained devices. However, the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) SNNs require multiple time steps for acceptable inference accuracy, increasing spiking activity and, consequently, energy consumption. SOTA training strategies for SNNs involve conversion from a non-spiking deep neural network (DNN). In this paper, we determine that SOTA conversion strategies cannot yield ultra low latency because they incorrectly assume that the DNN and SNN pre-activation values are uniformly distributed. We propose a new training algorithm that accurately captures these distributions, minimizing the error between the DNN and converted SNN. The resulting SNNs have ultra low latency and high activation sparsity, yielding significant improvements in compute efficiency. In particular, we evaluate our framework on image recognition tasks from CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets on several VGG and ResNet architectures. We obtain top-1 accuracy of 64.19% with only 2 time steps on the CIFAR-100 dataset with ~159.2x lower compute energy compared to an iso-architecture standard DNN. Compared to other SOTA SNN models, our models perform inference 2.5-8x faster (i.e., with fewer time steps).

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2021.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2020Incorporating Learnable Membrane Time Constant to Enhance Learning of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 345
  4. 2018Going Deeper in Spiking Neural Networks: VGG and Residual Architecturescited by 245
  5. 2018Direct Training for Spiking Neural Networks: Faster, Larger, Bettercited by 233
  6. 2016Training Deep Spiking Neural Networks using Backpropagationcited by 205
  7. 2020Enabling Deep Spiking Neural Networks with Hybrid Conversion and Spike Timing Dependent Backpropagationcited by 144
  8. 2021Optimal Conversion of Conventional Artificial Neural Networks to Spiking Neural Networkscited by 139
  9. 2019Enabling Spike-based Backpropagation for Training Deep Neural Network Architecturescited by 123
  10. 2021A Free Lunch From ANN: Towards Efficient, Accurate Spiking Neural Networks Calibrationcited by 117
  11. 2020Revisiting Batch Normalization for Training Low-latency Deep Spiking Neural Networks from Scratchcited by 80
  12. 2020DIET-SNN: Direct Input Encoding With Leakage and Threshold Optimization in Deep Spiking Neural Networkscited by 71
8 more
  1. 2021HIRE-SNN: Harnessing the Inherent Robustness of Energy-Efficient Deep Spiking Neural Networks by Training with Crafted Input Noisecited by 65
  2. 2019S4NN: temporal backpropagation for spiking neural networks with one spike per neuroncited by 49
  3. 2020T2FSNN: Deep Spiking Neural Networks with Time-to-first-spike Codingcited by 46
  4. 2019Temporal Coding in Spiking Neural Networks with Alpha Synaptic Function: Learning with Backpropagationcited by 45
  5. 2016Conversion of Artificial Recurrent Neural Networks to Spiking Neural Networks for Low-power Neuromorphic Hardwarecited by 40
  6. 2020TCL: an ANN-to-SNN Conversion with Trainable Clipping Layerscited by 20
  7. 2021Training Energy-Efficient Deep Spiking Neural Networks with Single-Spike Hybrid Input Encodingcited by 10
  8. 2021Towards Low-Latency Energy-Efficient Deep SNNs via Attention-Guided Compressioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

9 papers.