An Alternate Policy Gradient Estimator for Softmax Policies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Policy gradient (PG) estimators are ineffective in dealing with softmax policies that are sub-optimally saturated, which refers to the situation when the policy concentrates its probability mass on sub-optimal actions. Sub-optimal policy saturation may arise from bad policy initialization or sudden changes in the environment that occur after the policy has already converged. Current softmax PG estimators require a large number of updates to overcome policy saturation, which causes low sample efficiency and poor adaptability to new situations. To mitigate this problem, we propose a novel PG estimator for softmax policies that utilizes the bias in the critic estimate and the noise present in the reward signal to escape the saturated regions of the policy parameter space. Our theoretical analysis and experiments, conducted on bandits and various reinforcement learning environments, show that this new estimator is significantly more robust to policy saturation.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2021.
Builds on
14 of 39 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,258
- 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 264
- 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 176
- 2017Time Limits in Reinforcement Learningcited by 79
- 2018Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Real-World Robotscited by 65
- 2021Softmax Policy Gradient Methods Can Take Exponential Time to Convergecited by 48
- 2020Beyond variance reduction: Understanding the true impact of baselines on policy optimizationcited by 32
- 2018Expected Policy Gradients for Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Weight Clipping for Deep Continual and Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2023Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Modelscited by 27
- 2024Deep Policy Gradient Methods Without Batch Updates, Target Networks, or Replay Bufferscited by 18
- 2024Revisiting Sparse Rewards for Goal-Reaching Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2023Do Not Train It: A Linear Neural Architecture Search of Graph Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2025Small steps no more: Global convergence of stochastic gradient bandits for arbitrary learning ratescited by 4
- 2022Examining Policy Entropy of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Personalization Taskscited by 3
- 2026Value Bonuses using Ensemble Errors for Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Models26 Sep 2026
- 2026Value Bonuses using Ensemble Errors for Exploration in Reinforcement Learning12 Feb 2026
- 2025Small steps no more: Global convergence of stochastic gradient bandits for arbitrary learning rates11 Feb 2025
- 2024Deep Policy Gradient Methods Without Batch Updates, Target Networks, or Replay Buffers22 Nov 2024
- 2024Weight Clipping for Deep Continual and Reinforcement Learning1 Jul 2024
- 2024Revisiting Sparse Rewards for Goal-Reaching Reinforcement Learning29 Jun 2024
- 2023Vanishing Gradients in Reinforcement Finetuning of Language Models31 Oct 2023
- 2023Do Not Train It: A Linear Neural Architecture Search of Graph Neural Networks23 May 2023
- 2022Examining Policy Entropy of Reinforcement Learning Agents for Personalization Tasks21 Nov 2022