Off Environment Evaluation Using Convex Risk Minimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Applying reinforcement learning (RL) methods on robots typically involves training a policy in simulation and deploying it on a robot in the real world. Because of the model mismatch between the real world and the simulator, RL agents deployed in this manner tend to perform suboptimally. To tackle this problem, researchers have developed robust policy learning algorithms that rely on synthetic noise disturbances. However, such methods do not guarantee performance in the target environment. We propose a convex risk minimization algorithm to estimate the model mismatch between the simulator and the target domain using trajectory data from both environments. We show that this estimator can be used along with the simulator to evaluate performance of an RL agents in the target domain, effectively bridging the gap between these two environments. We also show that the convergence rate of our estimator to be of the order of n-1/4, where n is the number of training samples. In simulation, we demonstrate how our method effectively approximates and evaluates performance on Gridworld, Cartpole, and Reacher environments on a range of policies. We also show that the our method is able to estimate performance of a 7 DOF robotic arm using the simulator and remotely collected data from the robot in the real world.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2021.
Builds on
23 of 32 references.
References · 23
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2016Data-Efficient Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
- 2019DualDICE: Behavior-Agnostic Estimation of Discounted Stationary Distribution Correctionscited by 254
- 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 242
11 more
- 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
- 2019Minimax Weight and Q-Function Learning for Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 150
- 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
- 2019Empirical Study of Off-Policy Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 121
- 2019Combining Planning and Deep Reinforcement Learning in Tactical Decision Making for Autonomous Drivingcited by 52
- 2018Importance Sampling Policy Evaluation with an Estimated Behavior Policycited by 34
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning based Recommendation with Explicit User-Item Interactions Modelingcited by 31
- 2015Adapting Deep Visuomotor Representations with Weak Pairwise Constraintscited by 25
- 2019Improved Robustness and Safety for Autonomous Vehicle Control with Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
- 2020Perspectives on Sim2Real Transfer for Robotics: A Summary of the R:SS 2020 Workshopcited by 22
- 2019Robot Sound Interpretation: Combining Sight and Sound in Learning-Based Controlcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.