mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning Emulation of Urban Land Surface Processes

arXiv 2112.11429 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2021cs.LG physics.ao-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Can we improve the modeling of urban land surface processes with machine learning (ML)? A prior comparison of urban land surface models (ULSMs) found that no single model is 'best' at predicting all common surface fluxes. Here, we develop an urban neural network (UNN) trained on the mean predicted fluxes from 22 ULSMs at one site. The UNN emulates the mean output of ULSMs accurately. When compared to a reference ULSM (Town Energy Balance; TEB), the UNN has greater accuracy relative to flux observations, less computational cost, and requires fewer input parameters. When coupled to the Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model using TensorFlow bindings, WRF-UNN is stable and more accurate than the reference WRF-TEB. Although the application is currently constrained by the training data (1 site), we show a novel approach to improve the modeling of surface fluxes by combining the strengths of several ULSMs into one using ML.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 119 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2021.

Builds on

7 of 119 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
  3. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  4. 2018Deep learning to represent sub-grid processes in climate modelscited by 156
  5. 2018Neural networks for post-processing ensemble weather forecastscited by 95
  6. 2020Copula-based synthetic data augmentation for machine-learning emulatorscited by 6
  7. 2021Machine Learning Emulation of 3D Cloud Radiative Effectscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.