mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Provable Adversarial Robustness in the Quantum Model

arXiv 2112.09625 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2021quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern machine learning systems have been applied successfully to a variety of tasks in recent years but making such systems robust against adversarially chosen modifications of input instances seems to be a much harder problem. It is probably fair to say that no fully satisfying solution has been found up to date and it is not clear if the standard formulation even allows for a principled solution. Hence, rather than following the classical path of bounded perturbations, we consider a model similar to the quantum PAC-learning model introduced by Bshouty and Jackson [1995]. Our first key contribution shows that in this model we can reduce adversarial robustness to the conjunction of two classical learning theory problems, namely (Problem 1) the problem of finding generative models and (Problem 2) the problem of devising classifiers that are robust with respect to distributional shifts. Our second key contribution is that the considered framework does not rely on specific (and hence also somewhat arbitrary) threat models like ℓp bounded perturbations. Instead, our reduction guarantees that in order to solve the adversarial robustness problem in our model it suffices to consider a single distance notion, i.e. the Hellinger distance. From the technical perspective our protocols are heavily based on the recent advances on delegation of quantum computation, e.g. Mahadev [2018]. Although the considered model is quantum and therefore not immediately applicable to ``real-world'' situations, one might hope that in the future either one can find a way to embed ``real-world'' problems into a quantum framework or that classical algorithms can be found that are capable of mimicking their powerful quantum counterparts.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  3. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  4. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  5. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  6. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  7. 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 305
  8. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
  9. 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
  10. 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 79
  11. 2021Out of Distribution Generalization in Machine Learningcited by 59
  12. 2020Beyond Perturbations: Learning Guarantees with Arbitrary Adversarial Test Examplescited by 44
4 more
  1. 2021Adversarially Robust Learning with Unknown Perturbation Setscited by 24
  2. 2018Adversarial Examples from Cryptographic Pseudo-Random Generatorscited by 10
  3. 2020Query complexity of adversarial attackscited by 5
  4. 2021Adversarial Robustness: What fools you makes you strongercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.