mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Expedition: A System for the Unsupervised Learning of a Hierarchy of Concepts

arXiv 2112.09348 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a system for bottom-up cumulative learning of myriad concepts corresponding to meaningful character strings, and their part-related and prediction edges. The learning is self-supervised in that the concepts discovered are used as predictors as well as targets of prediction. We devise an objective for segmenting with the learned concepts, derived from comparing to a baseline prediction system, that promotes making and using larger concepts, which in turn allows for predicting larger spans of text, and we describe a simple technique to promote exploration, i.e. trying out newly generated concepts in the segmentation process. We motivate and explain a layering of the concepts, to help separate the (conditional) distributions learnt among concepts. The layering of the concepts roughly corresponds to a part-whole concept hierarchy. With rudimentary segmentation and learning algorithms, the system is promising in that it acquires many concepts (tens of thousands in our small-scale experiments), and it learns to segment text well: when fed with English text with spaces removed, starting at the character level, much of what is learned respects word or phrase boundaries, and over time the average number of "bad" splits within segmentations, i.e. splits inside words, decreases as larger concepts are discovered and the system learns when to use them during segmentation. We report on promising experiments when the input text is converted to binary and the system begins with only two concepts, "0" and "1". The system is transparent, in the sense that it is easy to tell what the concepts learned correspond to, and which ones are active in a segmentation, or how the system "sees" its input. We expect this framework to be extensible and we discuss the current limitations and a number of directions for enhancing the learning and inference capabilities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.

Builds on

17 of 56 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  5. 2015Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning by Context Predictioncited by 1,062
  6. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  7. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  8. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 668
  9. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 659
  10. 2019Self-supervised Visual Feature Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 656
  11. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 223
  12. 2018Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attentioncited by 138
5 more
  1. 2016A Survey of Semantic Segmentationcited by 30
  2. 2019Coincidence, Categorization, and Consolidation: Learning to Recognize Sounds with Minimal Supervisioncited by 27
  3. 2014Frequently Asked Questions for: The Atoms of Neural Computationcited by 4
  4. 2017Self-Supervised Relative Depth Learning for Urban Scene Understandingcited by 2
  5. 2020Binomial Tails for Community Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.