mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving Unsupervised Stain-To-Stain Translation using Self-Supervision and Meta-Learning

arXiv 2112.08837 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2021eess.IV cs.CV q-bio.QMcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In digital pathology, many image analysis tasks are challenged by the need for large and time-consuming manual data annotations to cope with various sources of variability in the image domain. Unsupervised domain adaptation based on image-to-image translation is gaining importance in this field by addressing variabilities without the manual overhead. Here, we tackle the variation of different histological stains by unsupervised stain-to-stain translation to enable a stain-independent applicability of a deep learning segmentation model. We use CycleGANs for stain-to-stain translation in kidney histopathology, and propose two novel approaches to improve translational effectivity. First, we integrate a prior segmentation network into the CycleGAN for a self-supervised, application-oriented optimization of translation through semantic guidance, and second, we incorporate extra channels to the translation output to implicitly separate artificial meta-information otherwise encoded for tackling underdetermined reconstructions. The latter showed partially superior performances to the unmodified CycleGAN, but the former performed best in all stains providing instance-level Dice scores ranging between 78% and 92% for most kidney structures, such as glomeruli, tubules, and veins. However, CycleGANs showed only limited performance in the translation of other structures, e.g. arteries. Our study also found somewhat lower performance for all structures in all stains when compared to segmentation in the original stain. Our study suggests that with current unsupervised technologies, it seems unlikely to produce generally applicable simulated stains.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2021.

Builds on

21 of 37 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  6. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
  7. 2019U-GAT-IT: Unsupervised Generative Attentional Networks with Adaptive Layer-Instance Normalization for Image-to-Image Translationcited by 186
  8. 2016Unsupervised Cross-Domain Image Generationcited by 125
  9. 2018Deep learning-based virtual histology staining using auto-fluorescence of label-free tissuecited by 70
  10. 2018StainGAN: Stain Style Transfer for Digital Histological Imagescited by 68
  11. 2018Deep Adversarial Training for Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathology Imagescited by 55
  12. 2020Deep learning-based transformation of the H&E stain into special stainscited by 55
9 more
  1. 2020Pix2Pix-based Stain-to-Stain Translation: A Solution for Robust Stain Normalization in Histopathology Images Analysiscited by 23
  2. 2019GAN-based Virtual Re-Staining: A Promising Solution for Whole Slide Image Analysiscited by 22
  3. 2019Adversarial Self-Defense for Cycle-Consistent GANscited by 20
  4. 2017Neural Stain-Style Transfer Learning using GAN for Histopathological Imagescited by 18
  5. 2020Generative Adversarial Networks in Digital Pathology: A Survey on Trends and Future Potentialcited by 17
  6. 2020Towards Histopathological Stain Invariance by Unsupervised Domain Augmentation using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 17
  7. 2018Strategies for Training Stain Invariant CNNscited by 7
  8. 2020Histopathological Stain Transfer using Style Transfer Network with Adversarial Losscited by 7
  9. 2018Unsupervisedly Training GANs for Segmenting Digital Pathology with Automatically Generated Annotationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.