mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

KGR^4: Retrieval, Retrospect, Refine and Rethink for Commonsense Generation

arXiv 2112.08266 ↗First posted 15 Dec 2021cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative commonsense reasoning requires machines to generate sentences describing an everyday scenario given several concepts, which has attracted much attention recently. However, existing models cannot perform as well as humans, since sentences they produce are often implausible and grammatically incorrect. In this paper, inspired by the process of humans creating sentences, we propose a novel Knowledge-enhanced Commonsense Generation framework, termed KGR^4, consisting of four stages: Retrieval, Retrospect, Refine, Rethink. Under this framework, we first perform retrieval to search for relevant sentences from external corpus as the prototypes. Then, we train the generator that either edits or copies these prototypes to generate candidate sentences, of which potential errors will be fixed by an autoencoder-based refiner. Finally, we select the output sentence from candidate sentences produced by generators with different hyper-parameters. Experimental results and in-depth analysis on the CommonGen benchmark strongly demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework. Particularly, KGR^4 obtains 33.56 SPICE points in the official leaderboard, outperforming the previously-reported best result by 2.49 SPICE points and achieving state-of-the-art performance.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2021.

Builds on

28 of 39 references.

References · 28

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  7. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  8. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  9. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  10. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  11. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  12. 2017Dense-Captioning Events in Videoscited by 789
16 more
  1. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 668
  2. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
  3. 2019VATEX: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Multilingual Dataset for Video-and-Language Researchcited by 412
  4. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  5. 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
  6. 2019KagNet: Knowledge-Aware Graph Networks for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 216
  7. 2020UniLMv2: Pseudo-Masked Language Models for Unified Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 204
  8. 2020Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering with Self-Talkcited by 161
  9. 2020KG-BART: Knowledge Graph-Augmented BART for Generative Commonsense Reasoningcited by 106
  10. 2020Pre-training Text-to-Text Transformers for Concept-centric Common Sensecited by 42
  11. 2016Variational Neural Machine Translationcited by 35
  12. 2018Variational Recurrent Neural Machine Translationcited by 23
  13. 2018Asynchronous Bidirectional Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 21
  14. 2020An Enhanced Knowledge Injection Model for Commonsense Generationcited by 21
  15. 2021Retrieval Enhanced Model for Commonsense Generationcited by 18
  16. 2016Variational Neural Discourse Relation Recognizercited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2.

6 papers.