Domain-informed neural networks for interaction localization within astroparticle experiments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work proposes a domain-informed neural network architecture for experimental particle physics, using particle interaction localization with the time-projection chamber (TPC) technology for dark matter research as an example application. A key feature of the signals generated within the TPC is that they allow localization of particle interactions through a process called reconstruction. While multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) have emerged as a leading contender for reconstruction in TPCs, such a black-box approach does not reflect prior knowledge of the underlying scientific processes. This paper looks anew at neural network-based interaction localization and encodes prior detector knowledge, in terms of both signal characteristics and detector geometry, into the feature encoding and the output layers of a multilayer neural network. The resulting Domain-informed Neural Network (DiNN) limits the receptive fields of the neurons in the initial feature encoding layers in order to account for the spatially localized nature of the signals produced within the TPC. This aspect of the DiNN, which has similarities with the emerging area of graph neural networks in that the neurons in the initial layers only connect to a handful of neurons in their succeeding layer, significantly reduces the number of parameters in the network in comparison to an MLP. In addition, in order to account for the detector geometry, the output layers of the network are modified using two geometric transformations to ensure the DiNN produces localizations within the interior of the detector. The end result is a neural network architecture that has 60% fewer parameters than an MLP, but that still achieves similar localization performance and provides a path to future architectural developments with improved performance because of their ability to encode additional domain knowledge into the architecture.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2021.
Builds on
18 of 60 references.
References · 18
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
- 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 792
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
- 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 456
- 2017Graph Signal Processing: Overview, Challenges and Applicationscited by 409
- 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
- 2018An Intriguing Failing of Convolutional Neural Networks and the CoordConv Solutioncited by 302
- 2018Energy Flow Networks: Deep Sets for Particle Jetscited by 83
6 more
- 2018Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Papercited by 48
- 2017Learning Particle Physics by Example: Location-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks for Physics Synthesiscited by 46
- 2018HexaConvcited by 27
- 2016A Convolutional Neural Network Neutrino Event Classifiercited by 26
- 2021A Convolutional Neural Network based Cascade Reconstruction for the IceCube Neutrino Observatorycited by 13
- 2018Machine Learning Accelerated Likelihood-Free Event Reconstruction in Dark Matter Direct Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.