Cross-Domain Generalization and Knowledge Transfer in Transformers Trained on Legal Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We analyze the ability of pre-trained language models to transfer knowledge among datasets annotated with different type systems and to generalize beyond the domain and dataset they were trained on. We create a meta task, over multiple datasets focused on the prediction of rhetorical roles. Prediction of the rhetorical role a sentence plays in a case decision is an important and often studied task in AI & Law. Typically, it requires the annotation of a large number of sentences to train a model, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Further, the application of the models is restrained to the same dataset it was trained on. We fine-tune language models and evaluate their performance across datasets, to investigate the models' ability to generalize across domains. Our results suggest that the approach could be helpful in overcoming the cold-start problem in active or interactvie learning, and shows the ability of the models to generalize across datasets and domains.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2021.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 209
- 2019StructBERT: Incorporating Language Structures into Pre-training for Deep Language Understandingcited by 109
- 2017Semi-supervised sequence tagging with bidirectional language modelscited by 86
- 2019Identification of Rhetorical Roles of Sentences in Indian Legal Judgmentscited by 39
- 2015Autonomy and Reliability of Continuous Active Learning for Technology-Assisted Reviewcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Textscited by 33
- 2022Data-Centric Machine Learning in the Legal Domaincited by 2
- 2022Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Argument Mining in Legal Textscited by 1
- 2025Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval?cited by 0
- 2025What Are the Facts? Automated Extraction of Court-Established Facts from Criminal-Court Opinionscited by 0
- 2025What Are the Facts? Automated Extraction of Court-Established Facts from Criminal-Court Opinions7 Nov 2025
- 2025Are manual annotations necessary for statutory interpretations retrieval?16 Jun 2025
- 2023Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Texts8 May 2023
- 2022Toward an Intelligent Tutoring System for Argument Mining in Legal Texts24 Oct 2022
- 2022Data-Centric Machine Learning in the Legal Domain17 Jan 2022