mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Value of ML Models

arXiv 2112.06775 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We argue that, when establishing and benchmarking Machine Learning (ML) models, the research community should favour evaluation metrics that better capture the value delivered by their model in practical applications. For a specific class of use cases -- selective classification -- we show that not only can it be simple enough to do, but that it has import consequences and provides insights what to look for in a ``good'' ML model.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

5 of 14 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  2. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
  3. 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
  4. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
  5. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 184

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.