How Private Is Your RL Policy? An Inverse RL Based Analysis Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning (RL) enables agents to learn how to perform various tasks from scratch. In domains like autonomous driving, recommendation systems, and more, optimal RL policies learned could cause a privacy breach if the policies memorize any part of the private reward. We study the set of existing differentially-private RL policies derived from various RL algorithms such as Value Iteration, Deep Q Networks, and Vanilla Proximal Policy Optimization. We propose a new Privacy-Aware Inverse RL (PRIL) analysis framework, that performs reward reconstruction as an adversarial attack on private policies that the agents may deploy. For this, we introduce the reward reconstruction attack, wherein we seek to reconstruct the original reward from a privacy-preserving policy using an Inverse RL algorithm. An adversary must do poorly at reconstructing the original reward function if the agent uses a tightly private policy. Using this framework, we empirically test the effectiveness of the privacy guarantee offered by the private algorithms on multiple instances of the FrozenLake domain of varying complexities. Based on the analysis performed, we infer a gap between the current standard of privacy offered and the standard of privacy needed to protect reward functions in RL. We do so by quantifying the extent to which each private policy protects the reward function by measuring distances between the original and reconstructed rewards.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2021.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
References · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2017Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
- 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2015Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
- 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
- 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Losscited by 73
- 2020Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guaranteescited by 51
5 more
- 2019Privacy-preserving Q-Learning with Functional Noise in Continuous State Spacescited by 29
- 2019How You Act Tells a Lot: Privacy-Leakage Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2016Differentially Private Policy Evaluationcited by 19
- 2019Actor Critic with Differentially Private Criticcited by 5
- 2019Privacy-Preserving Multi-Party Contextual Banditscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
5 papers.
- 2022New Challenges in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey of Security and Privacycited by 7
- 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challengescited by 5
- 2023BRNES: Enabling Security and Privacy-aware Experience Sharing in Multiagent Robotic and Autonomous Systemscited by 1
- 2024Differentially Private Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2024Preserving the Privacy of Reward Functions in MDPs through Deceptioncited by 1
- 2024Preserving the Privacy of Reward Functions in MDPs through Deception13 Jul 2024
- 2024Differentially Private Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning8 Feb 2024
- 2023BRNES: Enabling Security and Privacy-aware Experience Sharing in Multiagent Robotic and Autonomous Systems2 Aug 2023
- 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Applications, Visionary Prospects, and Challenges17 May 2023
- 2022New Challenges in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey of Security and Privacy31 Dec 2022