mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Annotation-efficient cancer detection with report-guided lesion annotation for deep learning-based prostate cancer detection in bpMRI

arXiv 2112.05151 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning-based diagnostic performance increases with more annotated data, but large-scale manual annotations are expensive and labour-intensive. Experts evaluate diagnostic images during clinical routine, and write their findings in reports. Leveraging unlabelled exams paired with clinical reports could overcome the manual labelling bottleneck. We hypothesise that detection models can be trained semi-supervised with automatic annotations generated using model predictions, guided by sparse information from clinical reports. To demonstrate efficacy, we train clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) segmentation models, where automatic annotations are guided by the number of clinically significant findings in the radiology reports. We included 7,756 prostate MRI examinations, of which 3,050 were manually annotated. We evaluated prostate cancer detection performance on 300 exams from an external centre with histopathology-confirmed ground truth. Semi-supervised training improved patient-based diagnostic area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 87.2 ± 0.8% to 89.4 ± 1.0% (P<10-4) and improved lesion-based sensitivity at one false positive per case from 76.4 ± 3.8% to 83.6 ± 2.3% (P<10-4). Semi-supervised training was 14× more annotation-efficient for case-based performance and 6× more annotation-efficient for lesion-based performance. This improved performance demonstrates the feasibility of our training procedure. Source code is publicly available at github.com/DIAGNijmegen/Report-Guided-Annotation. Best csPCa detection algorithm is available at grand-challenge.org/algorithms/bpmri-cspca-detection-report-guided-annotations/.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2021.

Builds on

16 of 45 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  3. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  4. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  5. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 462
  6. 2019Uncertainty-aware Self-ensembling Model for Semi-supervised 3D Left Atrium Segmentationcited by 378
  7. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
  8. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  9. 2020Contrastive learning of global and local features for medical image segmentation with limited annotationscited by 309
  10. 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 178
  11. 2019Models Genesis: Generic Autodidactic Models for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 159
  12. 2019A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseasescited by 118
4 more
  1. 2019Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies using Deep Learningcited by 69
  2. 2021nnDetection: A Self-configuring Method for Medical Object Detectioncited by 60
  3. 2021End-to-end Prostate Cancer Detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of Attention Mechanisms, Clinical Priori and Decoupled False Positive Reductioncited by 32
  4. 2020CorrSigNet: Learning CORRelated Prostate Cancer SIGnatures from Radiology and Pathology Images for Improved Computer Aided Diagnosiscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

11 papers.