On Complexity of 1-Center in Various Metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the classic 1-center problem: Given a set P of n points in a metric space find the point in P that minimizes the maximum distance to the other points of P. We study the complexity of this problem in d-dimensional ℓp-metrics and in edit and Ulam metrics over strings of length d. Our results for the 1-center problem may be classified based on d as follows. bullet Small d: Assuming the hitting set conjecture (HSC), we show that when d=ω(log n), no subquadratic algorithm can solve 1-center problem in any of the ℓp-metrics, or in edit or Ulam metrics. bullet Large d: When d=Omega(n), we extend our conditional lower bound to rule out subquartic algorithms for 1-center problem in edit metric (assuming Quantified SETH). On the other hand, we give a (1+ε)-approximation for 1-center in Ulam metric with running time tildeOvarepsilon(nd+n2√d). We also strengthen some of the above lower bounds by allowing approximations or by reducing the dimension d, but only against a weaker class of algorithms which list all requisite solutions. Moreover, we extend one of our hardness results to rule out subquartic algorithms for the well-studied 1-median problem in the edit metric, where given a set of n strings each of length n, the goal is to find a string in the set that minimizes the sum of the edit distances to the rest of the strings in the set.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2021.
Builds on
11 of 40 references.
References · 11
- 2016Geometric Median in Nearly Linear Timecited by 39
- 2018Hardness of Approximate Nearest Neighbor Searchcited by 19
- 2014Edit Distance Cannot Be Computed in Strongly Subquadratic Time (unless SETH is false)cited by 18
- 2020On Approximability of Clustering Problems Without Candidate Centerscited by 13
- 2018On The Hardness of Approximate and Exact (Bichromatic) Maximum Inner Productcited by 12
- 2015Quadratic Conditional Lower Bounds for String Problems and Dynamic Time Warpingcited by 6
- 2017On the Difference Between Closest, Furthest, and Orthogonal Pairs: Nearly-Linear vs Barely-Subquadratic Complexity in Computational Geometrycited by 6
- 2016On the Complexity of Closest Pair via Polar-Pair of Point-Setscited by 2
- 2018Polyline Simplification has Cubic Complexitycited by 1
- 2020Scheduling Lower Bounds via AND Subset Sumcited by 1
- 2020Approximating the Median under the Ulam Metriccited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.
- 2023Can You Solve Closest String Faster than Exhaustive Search?26 May 2023