mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Two-step Lookahead Bayesian Optimization with Inequality Constraints

arXiv 2112.02833 ↗First posted 6 Dec 2021stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in computationally efficient non-myopic Bayesian optimization (BO) improve query efficiency over traditional myopic methods like expected improvement while only modestly increasing computational cost. These advances have been largely limited, however, to unconstrained optimization. For constrained optimization, the few existing non-myopic BO methods require heavy computation. For instance, one existing non-myopic constrained BO method [Lam and Willcox, 2017] relies on computationally expensive unreliable brute-force derivative-free optimization of a Monte Carlo rollout acquisition function. Methods that use the reparameterization trick for more efficient derivative-based optimization of non-myopic acquisition functions in the unconstrained setting, like sample average approximation and infinitesimal perturbation analysis, do not extend: constraints introduce discontinuities in the sampled acquisition function surface that hinder its optimization. Moreover, we argue here that being non-myopic is even more important in constrained problems because fear of violating constraints pushes myopic methods away from sampling the boundary between feasible and infeasible regions, slowing the discovery of optimal solutions with tight constraints. In this paper, we propose a computationally efficient two-step lookahead constrained Bayesian optimization acquisition function (2-OPT-C) supporting both sequential and batch settings. To enable fast acquisition function optimization, we develop a novel likelihood-ratio-based unbiased estimator of the gradient of the two-step optimal acquisition function that does not use the reparameterization trick. In numerical experiments, 2-OPT-C typically improves query efficiency by 2x or more over previous methods, and in some cases by 10x or more.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2021.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  2. 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 359
  3. 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 202
  4. 2014Predictive Entropy Search for Efficient Global Optimization of Black-box Functionscited by 201
  5. 2014Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 109
  6. 2017Constrained Bayesian Optimization with Noisy Experimentscited by 103
  7. 2020Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 84
  8. 2015Predictive Entropy Search for Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 51
  9. 2020Fair Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
  10. 2016Parallel Bayesian Global Optimization of Expensive Functionscited by 43
  11. 2020Efficient Nonmyopic Bayesian Optimization via One-Shot Multi-Step Treescited by 41
  12. 2015GLASSES: Relieving The Myopia Of Bayesian Optimisationcited by 38
7 more
  1. 2019BINOCULARS for Efficient, Nonmyopic Sequential Experimental Designcited by 35
  2. 2020Bayesian Optimization of Risk Measurescited by 35
  3. 2016Bayesian optimization under mixed constraints with a slack-variable augmented Lagrangiancited by 29
  4. 2017Multi-Period Trading via Convex Optimizationcited by 21
  5. 2019Multi-Attribute Bayesian Optimization With Interactive Preference Learningcited by 21
  6. 2019Constrained Bayesian Optimization with Max-Value Entropy Searchcited by 20
  7. 2020Efficient Rollout Strategies for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

4 papers.