View-Consistent Metal Segmentation in the Projection Domain for Metal Artifact Reduction in CBCT -- An Investigation of Potential Improvement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The positive outcome of a trauma intervention depends on an intraoperative evaluation of inserted metallic implants. Due to occurring metal artifacts, the quality of this evaluation heavily depends on the performance of so-called Metal Artifact Reduction methods (MAR). The majority of these MAR methods require prior segmentation of the inserted metal objects. Therefore, typically a rather simple thresholding-based segmentation method in the reconstructed 3D volume is applied, despite some major disadvantages. With this publication, the potential of shifting the segmentation task to a learning-based, view-consistent 2D projection-based method on the downstream MAR's outcome is investigated. For segmenting the present metal, a rather simple learning-based 2D projection-wise segmentation network that is trained using real data acquired during cadaver studies, is examined. To overcome the disadvantages that come along with a 2D projection-wise segmentation, a Consistency Filter is proposed. The influence of the shifted segmentation domain is investigated by comparing the results of the standard fsMAR with a modified fsMAR version using the new segmentation masks. With a quantitative and qualitative evaluation on real cadaver data, the investigated approach showed an increased MAR performance and a high insensitivity against metal artifacts. For cases with metal outside the reconstruction's FoV or cases with vanishing metal, a significant reduction in artifacts could be shown. Thus, increases of up to roughly 3 dB w.r.t. the mean PSNR metric over all slices and up to 9 dB for single slices were achieved. The shown results reveal a beneficial influence of the shift to a 2D-based segmentation method on real data for downstream use with a MAR method, like the fsMAR.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2021.
Builds on
12 of 27 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
- 2016The Importance of Skip Connections in Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 126
- 2018No New-Netcited by 61
- 2018DeepDRR -- A Catalyst for Machine Learning in Fluoroscopy-guided Procedurescited by 55
- 2020Deep Sinogram Completion with Image Prior for Metal Artifact Reduction in CT Imagescited by 40
- 2017CT sinogram-consistency learning for metal-induced beam hardening correctioncited by 21
- 2021Learning-Based Patch-Wise Metal Segmentation with Consistency Checkcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.