Automatic evaluation of scientific abstracts through natural language processing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work presents a framework to classify and evaluate distinct research abstract texts which are focused on the description of processes and their applications. In this context, this paper proposes natural language processing algorithms to classify, segment and evaluate the results of scientific work. Initially, the proposed framework categorize the abstract texts into according to the problems intended to be solved by employing a text classification approach. Then, the abstract text is segmented into problem description, methodology and results. Finally, the methodology of the abstract is ranked based on the sentiment analysis of its results. The proposed framework allows us to quickly rank the best methods to solve specific problems. To validate the proposed framework, oil production anomaly abstracts were experimented and achieved promising results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2021.
Builds on
4 of 13 references.
References · 4
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 546
- 2020Top2Vec: Distributed Representations of Topicscited by 126
- 2017PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstractscited by 124
Built on by
Not cited yet.