mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Target Propagation via Regularized Inversion

arXiv 2112.01453 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2021cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Target Propagation (TP) algorithms compute targets instead of gradients along neural networks and propagate them backward in a way that is similar yet different than gradient back-propagation (BP). The idea was first presented as a perturbative alternative to back-propagation that may achieve greater accuracy in gradient evaluation when training multi-layer neural networks (LeCun et al., 1989). However, TP has remained more of a template algorithm with many variations than a well-identified algorithm. Revisiting insights of LeCun et al., (1989) and more recently of Lee et al. (2015), we present a simple version of target propagation based on regularized inversion of network layers, easily implementable in a differentiable programming framework. We compare its computational complexity to the one of BP and delineate the regimes in which TP can be attractive compared to BP. We show how our TP can be used to train recurrent neural networks with long sequences on various sequence modeling problems. The experimental results underscore the importance of regularization in TP in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2021.

Builds on

29 of 72 references.

References · 29

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  4. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
  5. 2015Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 294
  6. 2016Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 240
  7. 2014Difference Target Propagationcited by 148
  8. 2016Decoupled Neural Interfaces using Synthetic Gradientscited by 137
  9. 2019Cheap Orthogonal Constraints in Neural Networks: A Simple Parametrization of the Orthogonal and Unitary Groupcited by 134
  10. 2015A Simple Way to Initialize Recurrent Networks of Rectified Linear Unitscited by 130
  11. 2018Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architecturescited by 101
  12. 2019Deep Learning without Weight Transportcited by 87
17 more
  1. 2017Orthogonal Recurrent Neural Networks with Scaled Cayley Transformcited by 83
  2. 2014How Auto-Encoders Could Provide Credit Assignment in Deep Networks via Target Propagationcited by 79
  3. 2016Training Neural Networks Without Gradients: A Scalable ADMM Approachcited by 61
  4. 2020A Theoretical Framework for Target Propagationcited by 57
  5. 2017Understanding Synthetic Gradients and Decoupled Neural Interfacescited by 35
  6. 2021Credit Assignment in Neural Networks through Deep Feedback Controlcited by 29
  7. 2019Learning to solve the credit assignment problemcited by 27
  8. 2019Direct Feedback Alignment with Sparse Connections for Local Learningcited by 26
  9. 2020Two Routes to Scalable Credit Assignment without Weight Symmetrycited by 19
  10. 2020GAIT-prop: A biologically plausible learning rule derived from backpropagation of errorcited by 15
  11. 2020Deriving Differential Target Propagation from Iterating Approximate Inversescited by 15
  12. 2021LocoProp: Enhancing BackProp via Local Loss Optimizationcited by 15
  13. 2017Proximal Backpropagationcited by 7
  14. 2017Training Language Models Using Target-Propagationcited by 5
  15. 2019Iterative Linearized Control: Stable Algorithms and Complexity Guaranteescited by 5
  16. 2020Deep Learning in Target Spacecited by 2
  17. 2020Differentiable Programming `a la Moreaucited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.