Reconsidering Tweets: Intervening During Tweet Creation Decreases Offensive Content
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The proliferation of harmful and offensive content is a problem that many online platforms face today. One of the most common approaches for moderating offensive content online is via the identification and removal after it has been posted, increasingly assisted by machine learning algorithms. More recently, platforms have begun employing moderation approaches which seek to intervene prior to offensive content being posted. In this paper, we conduct an online randomized controlled experiment on Twitter to evaluate a new intervention that aims to encourage participants to reconsider their offensive content and, ultimately, seeks to reduce the amount of offensive content on the platform. The intervention prompts users who are about to post harmful content with an opportunity to pause and reconsider their Tweet. We find that users in our treatment prompted with this intervention posted 6% fewer offensive Tweets than non-prompted users in our control. This decrease in the creation of offensive content can be attributed not just to the deletion and revision of prompted Tweets -- we also observed a decrease in both the number of offensive Tweets that prompted users create in the future and the number of offensive replies to prompted Tweets. We conclude that interventions allowing users to reconsider their comments can be an effective mechanism for reducing offensive content online.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2022Proactively Reducing the Hate Intensity of Online Posts via Hate Speech Normalizationcited by 17
- 2023Can Language Model Moderators Improve the Health of Online Discourse?cited by 12
- 2024HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twittercited by 12
- 2023The DSA Transparency Database: Auditing Self-reported Moderation Actions by Social Mediacited by 10
- 2024The Computational Anatomy of Humility: Modeling Intellectual Humility in Online Public Discoursecited by 3
- 2022Personalized Interventions for Online Moderationcited by 2
- 2022A Keyword Based Approach to Understanding the Overpenalization of Marginalized Groups by English Marginal Abuse Models on Twittercited by 1
- 2025Context-Aware Detection and Victim-Centered Response Generation for Online Harassment in Private Messagingcited by 0
- 2026Cyberbullying Governance on Social Media: A Unified Framework from Content Identification to Interventioncited by 0
- 2026AI Should Facilitate Democratic Deliberation at Scalecited by 0
- 2026From Web(logs) to Web(AI): Questions, Platforms, and Methods across Twenty Editions of ICWSMcited by 0
- 2026From Web(logs) to Web(AI): Questions, Platforms, and Methods across Twenty Editions of ICWSM20 Sep 2026
- 2026AI Should Facilitate Democratic Deliberation at Scale17 Sep 2026
- 2026Cyberbullying Governance on Social Media: A Unified Framework from Content Identification to Intervention26 May 2026
- 2025Context-Aware Detection and Victim-Centered Response Generation for Online Harassment in Private Messaging28 Nov 2025
- 2024HateDay: Insights from a Global Hate Speech Dataset Representative of a Day on Twitter23 Nov 2024
- 2024The Computational Anatomy of Humility: Modeling Intellectual Humility in Online Public Discourse19 Oct 2024
- 2023The DSA Transparency Database: Auditing Self-reported Moderation Actions by Social Media16 Dec 2023
- 2023Can Language Model Moderators Improve the Health of Online Discourse?16 Nov 2023
- 2022A Keyword Based Approach to Understanding the Overpenalization of Marginalized Groups by English Marginal Abuse Models on Twitter7 Oct 2022
- 2022Proactively Reducing the Hate Intensity of Online Posts via Hate Speech Normalization8 Jun 2022
- 2022Personalized Interventions for Online Moderation19 May 2022