ℓ_∞-Robustness and Beyond: Unleashing Efficient Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks: adding well-crafted, imperceptible perturbations to their input can modify their output. Adversarial training is one of the most effective approaches in training robust models against such attacks. However, it is much slower than vanilla training of neural networks since it needs to construct adversarial examples for the entire training data at every iteration, hampering its effectiveness. Recently, Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) was proposed that can obtain robust models efficiently. However, the reasons behind its success are not fully understood, and more importantly, it can only train robust models for ℓ_∞-bounded attacks as it uses FGSM during training. In this paper, by leveraging the theory of coreset selection, we show how selecting a small subset of training data provides a general, more principled approach toward reducing the time complexity of robust training. Unlike existing methods, our approach can be adapted to a wide variety of training objectives, including TRADES, ℓp-PGD, and Perceptual Adversarial Training (PAT). Our experimental results indicate that our approach speeds up adversarial training by 2-3 times while experiencing a slight reduction in the clean and robust accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.
Builds on
28 of 46 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
16 more
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2020Reflection Backdoor: A Natural Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 341
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
- 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
- 2019Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systemscited by 151
- 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
- 2019Functional Adversarial Attackscited by 82
- 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
- 2016Restricted Strong Convexity Implies Weak Submodularitycited by 51
- 2020Introduction to Core-sets: an Updated Surveycited by 45
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.
11 papers.
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 469
- 2023Spanning Training Progress: Temporal Dual-Depth Scoring (TDDS) for Enhanced Dataset Pruningcited by 38
- 2023MimicDiffusion: Purifying Adversarial Perturbation via Mimicking Clean Diffusion Modelcited by 18
- 2024Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and Generalizationcited by 15
- 2023Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024Adversarial Guided Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 8
- 2025Training-Free Dataset Pruning for Instance Segmentationcited by 7
- 2025Diffusion-based Cumulative Adversarial Purification for Vision Language Modelscited by 2
- 2023Do we need entire training data for adversarial training?cited by 1
- 2024LightPure: Realtime Adversarial Image Purification for Mobile Devices Using Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2025Model-Free Adversarial Purification via Coarse-To-Fine Tensor Network Representationcited by 0
- 2025Diffusion-based Cumulative Adversarial Purification for Vision Language Models4 Jun 2025
- 2025Training-Free Dataset Pruning for Instance Segmentation2 Mar 2025
- 2025Model-Free Adversarial Purification via Coarse-To-Fine Tensor Network Representation25 Feb 2025
- 2024LightPure: Realtime Adversarial Image Purification for Mobile Devices Using Diffusion Models31 Aug 2024
- 2024Adversarial Guided Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification24 Mar 2024
- 2024Adversarial Training on Purification (AToP): Advancing Both Robustness and Generalization29 Jan 2024
- 2023Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Survey13 Dec 2023
- 2023MimicDiffusion: Purifying Adversarial Perturbation via Mimicking Clean Diffusion Model8 Dec 2023
- 2023Spanning Training Progress: Temporal Dual-Depth Scoring (TDDS) for Enhanced Dataset Pruning22 Nov 2023
- 2023Do we need entire training data for adversarial training?10 Mar 2023
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification16 May 2022