mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ℓ_∞-Robustness and Beyond: Unleashing Efficient Adversarial Training

arXiv 2112.00378 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks: adding well-crafted, imperceptible perturbations to their input can modify their output. Adversarial training is one of the most effective approaches in training robust models against such attacks. However, it is much slower than vanilla training of neural networks since it needs to construct adversarial examples for the entire training data at every iteration, hampering its effectiveness. Recently, Fast Adversarial Training (FAT) was proposed that can obtain robust models efficiently. However, the reasons behind its success are not fully understood, and more importantly, it can only train robust models for ℓ_∞-bounded attacks as it uses FGSM during training. In this paper, by leveraging the theory of coreset selection, we show how selecting a small subset of training data provides a general, more principled approach toward reducing the time complexity of robust training. Unlike existing methods, our approach can be adapted to a wide variety of training objectives, including TRADES, ℓp-PGD, and Perceptual Adversarial Training (PAT). Our experimental results indicate that our approach speeds up adversarial training by 2-3 times while experiencing a slight reduction in the clean and robust accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  8. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  9. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  10. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  12. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
16 more
  1. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  2. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  3. 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
  4. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  5. 2020Reflection Backdoor: A Natural Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 341
  6. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  7. 2021GRAD-MATCH: Gradient Matching based Data Subset Selection for Efficient Deep Model Trainingcited by 269
  8. 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 224
  9. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  10. 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
  11. 2019Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systemscited by 151
  12. 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
  13. 2019Functional Adversarial Attackscited by 82
  14. 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
  15. 2016Restricted Strong Convexity Implies Weak Submodularitycited by 51
  16. 2020Introduction to Core-sets: an Updated Surveycited by 45

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

11 papers.