A Dataset-Dispersion Perspective on Reconstruction Versus Recognition in Single-View 3D Reconstruction Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks (NN) for single-view 3D reconstruction (SVR) have gained in popularity. Recent work points out that for SVR, most cutting-edge NNs have limited performance on reconstructing unseen objects because they rely primarily on recognition (i.e., classification-based methods) rather than shape reconstruction. To understand this issue in depth, we provide a systematic study on when and why NNs prefer recognition to reconstruction and vice versa. Our finding shows that a leading factor in determining recognition versus reconstruction is how dispersed the training data is. Thus, we introduce the dispersion score, a new data-driven metric, to quantify this leading factor and study its effect on NNs. We hypothesize that NNs are biased toward recognition when training images are more dispersed and training shapes are less dispersed. Our hypothesis is supported and the dispersion score is proved effective through our experiments on synthetic and benchmark datasets. We show that the proposed metric is a principal way to analyze reconstruction quality and provides novel information in addition to the conventional reconstruction score.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
- 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
- 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 979
- 2018Pixel2Mesh: Generating 3D Mesh Models from Single RGB Imagescited by 651
- 20163D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 588
- 2018AtlasNet: A Papier-Mach'e Approach to Learning 3D Surface Generationcited by 539
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2019DISN: Deep Implicit Surface Network for High-quality Single-view 3D Reconstructioncited by 333
- 2019What Do Single-view 3D Reconstruction Networks Learn?cited by 260
8 more
- 2018Pix3D: Dataset and Methods for Single-Image 3D Shape Modelingcited by 218
- 2017Octree Generating Networks: Efficient Convolutional Architectures for High-resolution 3D Outputscited by 189
- 2017Multi-view Supervision for Single-view Reconstruction via Differentiable Ray Consistencycited by 177
- 2017MarrNet: 3D Shape Reconstruction via 2.5D Sketchescited by 108
- 2016Perspective Transformer Nets: Learning Single-View 3D Object Reconstruction without 3D Supervisioncited by 106
- 2018Point Cloud GANcited by 79
- 2018Pixels, voxels, and views: A study of shape representations for single view 3D object shape predictioncited by 27
- 2020On the generalization of learning-based 3D reconstructioncited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.