Online Fair Revenue Maximizing Cake Division with Non-Contiguous Pieces in Adversarial Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The classic cake-cutting problem provides a model for addressing the fair and efficient allocation of a divisible, heterogeneous resource among agents with distinct preferences. Focusing on a standard formulation of cake cutting, in which each agent must receive a contiguous piece of the cake in an offline setting, this work instead focuses on online allocating non-contiguous pieces of cake among agents and establishes algorithmic results for fairness measures. In this regard, we made use of classic adversarial multi-armed bandits to achieve sub-linear Fairness and Revenue Regret at the same time. Adversarial bandits are powerful tools to model the adversarial reinforcement learning environments, that provide strong upper-bounds for regret of learning with just observing one action's reward in each step by applying smart trade-off between exploration and exploitation. This work studies the power of the famous EXP_3 algorithm that is based on exponential wight{-}importance updating probability distribution through time horizon.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2021.
Builds on
7 of 14 references.
References · 7
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,005
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 585
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 42
- 2019Advancing subgroup fairness via sleeping expertscited by 29
- 2016Fair Algorithms for Infinite and Contextual Banditscited by 17
- 2018On preserving non-discrimination when combining expert advicecited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practicecited by 14
- 2024Fairness in Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 9
- 2024Fairness in Reinforcement Learning: A Survey11 May 2024
- 2022Survey on Fair Reinforcement Learning: Theory and Practice20 May 2022