mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance of a GPU- and Time-Efficient Pseudo 3D Network for Magnetic Resonance Image Super-Resolution and Motion Artifact Reduction

arXiv 2111.14259 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2021eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Shortening acquisition time and reducing motion artifacts are the most critical challenges in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Deep learning-based image restoration has emerged as a promising solution capable of generating high-resolution and motion-artifact-free MRI images from low-resolution images acquired with shortened acquisition times or from motion-artifact-corrupted images. To facilitate clinical integration, a time- and GPU-efficient network with reliable accuracy is essential. In this study, we adopted a unified 2D deep learning framework for pseudo-3D MRI image super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) and motion artifact reduction (MAR). The optimal down-sampling factors to optimize the acquisition time in SRR were identified. Training for MAR was performed using publicly available in vivo data, employing a novel standardized method to induce motion artifacts of varying severity in a controlled way. The accuracy of the network was evaluated through a pixel-wise uncertainty map, and performance was benchmarked against state-of-the-art methods. The results demonstrated that the down-sampling factor of 1x1x2 for x2 acceleration and 2x2x2 for x4 acceleration was optimal. For SRR, the proposed TS-RCAN outperformed the 3D networks of mDCSRN and ReCNN, with an improvement of more than 0.01 in SSIM and 1.5 dB in PSNR while reducing GPU load by up to and inference time by up to 90%. For MAR, TS-RCAN exceeded UNet's performance by up to 0.014 in SSIM and 1.48 dB in PSNR. Additionally, TS-RCAN provided uncertainty information, which can be used to estimate the quality of the reconstructed images. TS-RCAN has potential use for SRR and MAR in the clinical setting.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2021.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  3. 2018Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Residual Channel Attention Networkscited by 1,256
  4. 2014Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 1,218
  5. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
  6. 2016Accelerating the Super-Resolution Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 393
  7. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  8. 2020Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep Learningcited by 292
  9. 2017A General and Adaptive Robust Loss Functioncited by 236
  10. 2018Efficient and Accurate MRI Super-Resolution using a Generative Adversarial Network and 3D Multi-Level Densely Connected Networkcited by 64
  11. 2018Brain MRI Super Resolution Using 3D Deep Densely Connected Neural Networkscited by 46
  12. 2021Multi-Contrast MRI Super-Resolution via a Multi-Stage Integration Networkcited by 42
5 more
  1. 2018Channel Splitting Network for Single MR Image Super-Resolutioncited by 26
  2. 2019Suppressing Model Overfitting for Image Super-Resolution Networkscited by 9
  3. 2020Convolutional Neural Networks with Intermediate Loss for 3D Super-Resolution of CT and MRI Scanscited by 7
  4. 2021Simultaneous super-resolution and motion artifact removal in diffusion-weighted MRI using unsupervised deep learningcited by 6
  5. 2019Anisotropic Super Resolution in Prostate MRI using Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.

4 papers.