Convolutional Neural Networks with Intermediate Loss for 3D Super-Resolution of CT and MRI Scans
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
CT scanners that are commonly-used in hospitals nowadays produce low-resolution images, up to 512 pixels in size. One pixel in the image corresponds to a one millimeter piece of tissue. In order to accurately segment tumors and make treatment plans, doctors need CT scans of higher resolution. The same problem appears in MRI. In this paper, we propose an approach for the single-image super-resolution of 3D CT or MRI scans. Our method is based on deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) composed of 10 convolutional layers and an intermediate upscaling layer that is placed after the first 6 convolutional layers. Our first CNN, which increases the resolution on two axes (width and height), is followed by a second CNN, which increases the resolution on the third axis (depth). Different from other methods, we compute the loss with respect to the ground-truth high-resolution output right after the upscaling layer, in addition to computing the loss after the last convolutional layer. The intermediate loss forces our network to produce a better output, closer to the ground-truth. A widely-used approach to obtain sharp results is to add Gaussian blur using a fixed standard deviation. In order to avoid overfitting to a fixed standard deviation, we apply Gaussian smoothing with various standard deviations, unlike other approaches. We evaluate our method in the context of 2D and 3D super-resolution of CT and MRI scans from two databases, comparing it to relevant related works from the literature and baselines based on various interpolation schemes, using 2x and 4x scaling factors. The empirical results show that our approach attains superior results to all other methods. Moreover, our human annotation study reveals that both doctors and regular annotators chose our method in favor of Lanczos interpolation in 97.55% cases for 2x upscaling factor and in 96.69% cases for 4x upscaling factor.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Single-subject Multi-contrast MRI Super-resolution via Implicit Neural Representationscited by 32
- 2022Multimodal Multi-Head Convolutional Attention with Various Kernel Sizes for Medical Image Super-Resolutioncited by 17
- 2024SuperFormer: Volumetric Transformer Architectures for MRI Super-Resolutioncited by 8
- 2022DA-VSR: Domain Adaptable Volumetric Super-Resolution For Medical Imagescited by 6
- 2021Performance of a GPU- and Time-Efficient Pseudo 3D Network for Magnetic Resonance Image Super-Resolution and Motion Artifact Reductioncited by 4
- 2023Fast and accurate sparse-view CBCT reconstruction using meta-learned neural attenuation field and hash-encoding regularizationcited by 1
- 2025Comprehensive Examination of Unrolled Networks for Solving Linear Inverse Problemscited by 1
- 2025Comprehensive Examination of Unrolled Networks for Solving Linear Inverse Problems8 Jan 2025
- 2024SuperFormer: Volumetric Transformer Architectures for MRI Super-Resolution5 Jun 2024
- 2023Fast and accurate sparse-view CBCT reconstruction using meta-learned neural attenuation field and hash-encoding regularization4 Dec 2023
- 2023Single-subject Multi-contrast MRI Super-resolution via Implicit Neural Representations27 Mar 2023
- 2022DA-VSR: Domain Adaptable Volumetric Super-Resolution For Medical Images11 Oct 2022
- 2022Multimodal Multi-Head Convolutional Attention with Various Kernel Sizes for Medical Image Super-Resolution8 Apr 2022
- 2021Performance of a GPU- and Time-Efficient Pseudo 3D Network for Magnetic Resonance Image Super-Resolution and Motion Artifact Reduction28 Nov 2021