mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impact of classification difficulty on the weight matrices spectra in Deep Learning and application to early-stopping

arXiv 2111.13331 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Much research effort has been devoted to explaining the success of deep learning. Random Matrix Theory (RMT) provides an emerging way to this end: spectral analysis of large random matrices involved in a trained deep neural network (DNN) such as weight matrices or Hessian matrices with respect to the stochastic gradient descent algorithm. To have more comprehensive understanding of weight matrices spectra, we conduct extensive experiments on weight matrices in different modules, e.g., layers, networks and data sets. Following the previous work of citemartin2018implicit, we classify the spectra in the terminal stage into three main types: Light Tail (LT), Bulk Transition period (BT) and Heavy Tail(HT). These different types, especially HT, implicitly indicate some regularization in the DNNs. A main contribution from the paper is that we identify the difficulty of the classification problem as a driving factor for the appearance of heavy tail in weight matrices spectra. Higher the classification difficulty, higher the chance for HT to appear. Moreover, the classification difficulty can be affected by the signal-to-noise ratio of the dataset, or by the complexity of the classification problem (complex features, large number of classes) as well. Leveraging on this finding, we further propose a spectral criterion to detect the appearance of heavy tails and use it to early stop the training process without testing data. Such early stopped DNNs have the merit of avoiding overfitting and unnecessary extra training while preserving a much comparable generalization ability. These findings from the paper are validated in several NNs, using Gaussian synthetic data and real data sets (MNIST and CIFAR10).

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2021.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  3. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  4. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  5. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
  6. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
  7. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
  8. 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 211
  9. 2016Eigenvalues of the Hessian in Deep Learning: Singularity and Beyondcited by 156
  10. 2020The Heavy-Tail Phenomenon in SGDcited by 122
  11. 2020Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing datacited by 113
  12. 2020Traces of Class/Cross-Class Structure Pervade Deep Learning Spectracited by 94
4 more
  1. 2017Regularization for Deep Learning: A Taxonomycited by 91
  2. 2019Measurements of Three-Level Hierarchical Structure in the Outliers in the Spectrum of Deepnet Hessianscited by 68
  3. 2021Post-mortem on a deep learning contest: a Simpson's paradox and the complementary roles of scale metrics versus shape metricscited by 19
  4. 2020Beyond Random Matrix Theory for Deep Networkscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

12 papers.