Universal Inference Meets Random Projections: A Scalable Test for Log-concavity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Shape constraints yield flexible middle grounds between fully nonparametric and fully parametric approaches to modeling distributions of data. The specific assumption of log-concavity is motivated by applications across economics, survival modeling, and reliability theory. However, there do not currently exist valid tests for whether the underlying density of given data is log-concave. The recent universal inference methodology provides a valid test. The universal test relies on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), and efficient methods already exist for finding the log-concave MLE. This yields the first test of log-concavity that is provably valid in finite samples in any dimension, for which we also establish asymptotic consistency results. Empirically, we find that a random projections approach that converts the d-dimensional testing problem into many one-dimensional problems can yield high power, leading to a simple procedure that is statistically and computationally efficient.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2021.
Builds on
4 of 45 references.
References · 4
- 2019Universal Inferencecited by 44
- 2017Recent progress in log-concave density estimationcited by 15
- 2019Optimality of Maximum Likelihood for Log-Concave Density Estimation and Bounded Convex Regressioncited by 10
- 2021A new computational framework for log-concave density estimationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.