mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimality of Maximum Likelihood for Log-Concave Density Estimation and Bounded Convex Regression

arXiv 1903.05315 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2019math.ST cs.LG stat.THcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study two problems: (1) estimation of a d-dimensional log-concave distribution and (2) bounded multivariate convex regression with random design with an underlying log-concave density or a compactly supported distribution with a continuous density. First, we show that for all d ≥ 4 the maximum likelihood estimators of both problems achieve an optimal risk of Thetad(n-2/(d+1)) (up to a logarithmic factor) in terms of squared Hellinger distance and L2 squared distance, respectively. Previously, the optimality of both these estimators was known only for d≤ 3. We also prove that the ε-entropy numbers of the two aforementioned families are equal up to logarithmic factors. We complement these results by proving a sharp bound Thetad(n-2/(d+4)) on the minimax rate (up to logarithmic factors) with respect to the total variation distance. Finally, we prove that estimating a log-concave density - even a uniform distribution on a convex set - up to a fixed accuracy requires the number of samples at least exponential in the dimension. We do that by improving the dimensional constant in the best known lower bound for the minimax rate from 2-d· n-2/(d+1) to c· n-2/(d+1) (when d≥ 2).

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

10 papers.