mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CONFAIR: Configurable and Interpretable Algorithmic Fairness

arXiv 2111.08878 ↗First posted 17 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid growth of data in the recent years has led to the development of complex learning algorithms that are often used to make decisions in real world. While the positive impact of the algorithms has been tremendous, there is a need to mitigate any bias arising from either training samples or implicit assumptions made about the data samples. This need becomes critical when algorithms are used in automated decision making systems that can hugely impact people's lives. Many approaches have been proposed to make learning algorithms fair by detecting and mitigating bias in different stages of optimization. However, due to a lack of a universal definition of fairness, these algorithms optimize for a particular interpretation of fairness which makes them limited for real world use. Moreover, an underlying assumption that is common to all algorithms is the apparent equivalence of achieving fairness and removing bias. In other words, there is no user defined criteria that can be incorporated into the optimization procedure for producing a fair algorithm. Motivated by these shortcomings of existing methods, we propose the CONFAIR procedure that produces a fair algorithm by incorporating user constraints into the optimization procedure. Furthermore, we make the process interpretable by estimating the most predictive features from data. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on several real world datasets using different fairness criteria.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2021.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  4. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
  5. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  6. 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 360
  7. 2017Forward and Reverse Gradient-Based Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 234
  8. 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
  9. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  10. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  11. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  12. 2019Clustering without Over-Representationcited by 50
4 more
  1. 2015On the relation between accuracy and fairness in binary classificationcited by 48
  2. 2020Fair Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 25
  3. 2017Decoupled classifiers for fair and efficient machine learningcited by 8
  4. 2020AML-SVM: Adaptive Multilevel Learning with Support Vector Machinescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.