DNN gradient lossless compression: Can GenNorm be the answer?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, the problem of optimal gradient lossless compression in Deep Neural Network (DNN) training is considered. Gradient compression is relevant in many distributed DNN training scenarios, including the recently popular federated learning (FL) scenario in which each remote users are connected to the parameter server (PS) through a noiseless but rate limited channel. In distributed DNN training, if the underlying gradient distribution is available, classical lossless compression approaches can be used to reduce the number of bits required for communicating the gradient entries. Mean field analysis has suggested that gradient updates can be considered as independent random variables, while Laplace approximation can be used to argue that gradient has a distribution approximating the normal (Norm) distribution in some regimes. In this paper we argue that, for some networks of practical interest, the gradient entries can be well modelled as having a generalized normal (GenNorm) distribution. We provide numerical evaluations to validate that the hypothesis GenNorm modelling provides a more accurate prediction of the DNN gradient tail distribution. Additionally, this modeling choice provides concrete improvement in terms of lossless compression of the gradients when applying classical fix-to-variable lossless coding algorithms, such as Huffman coding, to the quantized gradient updates. This latter results indeed provides an effective compression strategy with low memory and computational complexity that has great practical relevance in distributed DNN training scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2021.
Builds on
10 of 18 references.
References · 10
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
- 2018The Convergence of Sparsified Gradient Methodscited by 228
- 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
- 2019Understanding Top-k Sparsification in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 56
- 2021Wireless Federated Learning with Limited Communication and Differential Privacycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Lossy Gradient Compression: How Much Accuracy Can One Bit Buy?cited by 3
- 2023M22: A Communication-Efficient Algorithm for Federated Learning Inspired by Rate-Distortioncited by 1
- 2022Convert, compress, correct: Three steps toward communication-efficient DNN trainingcited by 0
- 2022How to Attain Communication-Efficient DNN Training? Convert, Compress, Correctcited by 0
- 2023M22: A Communication-Efficient Algorithm for Federated Learning Inspired by Rate-Distortion23 Jan 2023
- 2022How to Attain Communication-Efficient DNN Training? Convert, Compress, Correct18 Apr 2022
- 2022Convert, compress, correct: Three steps toward communication-efficient DNN training17 Mar 2022
- 2022Lossy Gradient Compression: How Much Accuracy Can One Bit Buy?6 Feb 2022