mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Learning Models Disclosure from Trusted Research Environments (TRE), Challenges and Opportunities

arXiv 2111.05628 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2021cs.CR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare and medicine have increased in recent years. To enable access to personal data, Trusted Research environments (TREs) provide safe and secure environments in which researchers can access sensitive personal data and develop Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning models. However currently few TREs support the use of automated AI-based modelling using Machine Learning. Early attempts have been made in the literature to present and introduce privacy preserving machine learning from the design point of view [1]. However, there exists a gap in the practical decision-making guidance for TREs in handling models disclosure. Specifically, the use of machine learning creates a need to disclose new types of outputs from TREs, such as trained machine learning models. Although TREs have clear policies for the disclosure of statistical outputs, the extent to which trained models can leak personal training data once released is not well understood and guidelines do not exist within TREs for the safe disclosure of these models. In this paper we introduce the challenge of disclosing trained machine learning models from TREs. We first give an overview of machine learning models in general and describe some of their applications in healthcare and medicine. We define the main vulnerabilities of trained machine learning models in general. We also describe the main factors affecting the vulnerabilities of disclosing machine learning models. This paper also provides insights and analyses methods that could be introduced within TREs to mitigate the risk of privacy breaches when disclosing trained models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2021.

Builds on

15 of 88 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  3. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  4. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  5. 2020Med-BERT: pre-trained contextualized embeddings on large-scale structured electronic health records for disease predictioncited by 368
  6. 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
  7. 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 165
  8. 2021Node-Level Membership Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural Networkscited by 80
  9. 2018Algorithms that Remember: Model Inversion Attacks and Data Protection Lawcited by 52
  10. 2021Survey: Leakage and Privacy at Inference Timecited by 44
  11. 2018Chiron: Privacy-preserving Machine Learning as a Servicecited by 38
  12. 2016DeepCare: A Deep Dynamic Memory Model for Predictive Medicinecited by 32
3 more
  1. 2019Optimization Problems for Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 15
  2. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Organ Localization in CTcited by 7
  3. 2018Precision medicine as a control problem: Using simulation and deep reinforcement learning to discover adaptive, personalized multi-cytokine therapy for sepsiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.