mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explaining neural network predictions of material strength

arXiv 2111.03729 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We recently developed a deep learning method that can determine the critical peak stress of a material by looking at scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the material's crystals. However, it has been somewhat unclear what kind of image features the network is keying off of when it makes its prediction. It is common in computer vision to employ an explainable AI saliency map to tell one what parts of an image are important to the network's decision. One can usually deduce the important features by looking at these salient locations. However, SEM images of crystals are more abstract to the human observer than natural image photographs. As a result, it is not easy to tell what features are important at the locations which are most salient. To solve this, we developed a method that helps us map features from important locations in SEM images to non-abstract textures that are easier to interpret.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2021.

Builds on

9 of 14 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  8. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 191
  9. 2019Efficient Saliency Maps for Explainable AIcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.