Causal versus Marginal Shapley Values for Robotic Lever Manipulation Controlled using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the effect of including domain knowledge about a robotic system's causal relations when generating explanations. To this end, we compare two methods from explainable artificial intelligence, the popular KernelSHAP and the recent causal SHAP, on a deep neural network trained using deep reinforcement learning on the task of controlling a lever using a robotic manipulator. A primary disadvantage of KernelSHAP is that its explanations represent only the features' direct effects on a model's output, not considering the indirect effects a feature can have on the output by affecting other features. Causal SHAP uses a partial causal ordering to alter KernelSHAP's sampling procedure to incorporate these indirect effects. This partial causal ordering defines the causal relations between the features, and we specify this using domain knowledge about the lever control task. We show that enabling an explanation method to account for indirect effects and incorporating some domain knowledge can lead to explanations that better agree with human intuition. This is especially favorable for a real-world robotics task, where there is considerable causality at play, and in addition, the required domain knowledge is often handily available.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2021.
Builds on
17 of 33 references.
References · 17
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 342
- 2020Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmarkcited by 300
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
- 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
5 more
- 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2020Towards Unifying Feature Attribution and Counterfactual Explanations: Different Means to the Same Endcited by 66
- 2019Generating Counterfactual and Contrastive Explanations using SHAPcited by 23
- 2021Robotic Lever Manipulation using Hindsight Experience Replay and Shapley Additive Explanationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley Valuescited by 26
- 2023Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Modelscited by 19
- 2022Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning, a Review into Current Methods and Applicationscited by 6
- 2025Approximating Shapley Explanations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Approximating Shapley Explanations in Reinforcement Learning8 Nov 2025
- 2023Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley Values9 Jun 2023
- 2023Explaining the Uncertain: Stochastic Shapley Values for Gaussian Process Models24 May 2023
- 2022Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning, a Review into Current Methods and Applications5 Jul 2022