mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning in Online MDPs: Is there a Price for Handling the Communicating Case?

arXiv 2111.02024 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2021cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is a remarkable fact that the same O(√T) regret rate can be achieved in both the Experts Problem and the Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandit problem albeit with a worse dependence on number of actions in the latter case. In contrast, it has been shown that handling online MDPs with communicating structure and bandit information incurs Omega(T2/3) regret even in the case of deterministic transitions. Is this the price we pay for handling communicating structure or is it because we also have bandit feedback? In this paper we show that with full information, online MDPs can still be learned at an O(√T) rate even in the presence of communicating structure. We first show this by proposing an efficient follow the perturbed leader (FPL) algorithm for the deterministic transition case. We then extend our scope to consider stochastic transitions where we first give an inefficient O(√T)-regret algorithm (with a mild additional condition on the dynamics). Then we show how to achieve Oleft(√fracTαright) regret rate using an oracle-efficient algorithm but with the additional restriction that the starting state distribution has mass at least α on each state.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.

Builds on

1 of 20 references.

References · 1

  1. 2013Bandits with Switching Costs: T^{2/3} Regretcited by 39

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.