Pareto Adversarial Robustness: Balancing Spatial Robustness and Sensitivity-based Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial robustness, which primarily comprises sensitivity-based robustness and spatial robustness, plays an integral part in achieving robust generalization. In this paper, we endeavor to design strategies to achieve universal adversarial robustness. To achieve this, we first investigate the relatively less-explored realm of spatial robustness. Then, we integrate the existing spatial robustness methods by incorporating both local and global spatial vulnerability into a unified spatial attack and adversarial training approach. Furthermore, we present a comprehensive relationship between natural accuracy, sensitivity-based robustness, and spatial robustness, supported by strong evidence from the perspective of robust representation. Crucially, to reconcile the interplay between the mutual impacts of various robustness components into one unified framework, we incorporate the textitPareto criterion into the adversarial robustness analysis, yielding a novel strategy called Pareto Adversarial Training for achieving universal robustness. The resulting Pareto front, which delineates the set of optimal solutions, provides an optimal balance between natural accuracy and various adversarial robustness. This sheds light on solutions for achieving universal robustness in the future. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider universal adversarial robustness via multi-objective optimization.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2021.
Builds on
28 of 47 references.
References · 28
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,423
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
16 more
- 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
- 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 182
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
- 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
- 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
- 2019Interpreting Adversarially Trained Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 75
- 2018On the Suitability of Lp-norms for Creating and Preventing Adversarial Examplescited by 57
- 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
- 2020Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbationscited by 55
- 2020Once-for-All Adversarial Training: In-Situ Tradeoff between Robustness and Accuracy for Freecited by 48
- 2014Pareto-Path Multi-Task Multiple Kernel Learningcited by 2
- 2019Joint Adversarial Training: Incorporating both Spatial and Pixel Attackscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.