mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Recursive Bayesian Networks: Generalising and Unifying Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars and Dynamic Bayesian Networks

arXiv 2111.01853 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.IRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Probabilistic context-free grammars (PCFGs) and dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs) are widely used sequence models with complementary strengths and limitations. While PCFGs allow for nested hierarchical dependencies (tree structures), their latent variables (non-terminal symbols) have to be discrete. In contrast, DBNs allow for continuous latent variables, but the dependencies are strictly sequential (chain structure). Therefore, neither can be applied if the latent variables are assumed to be continuous and also to have a nested hierarchical dependency structure. In this paper, we present Recursive Bayesian Networks (RBNs), which generalise and unify PCFGs and DBNs, combining their strengths and containing both as special cases. RBNs define a joint distribution over tree-structured Bayesian networks with discrete or continuous latent variables. The main challenge lies in performing joint inference over the exponential number of possible structures and the continuous variables. We provide two solutions: 1) For arbitrary RBNs, we generalise inside and outside probabilities from PCFGs to the mixed discrete-continuous case, which allows for maximum posterior estimates of the continuous latent variables via gradient descent, while marginalising over network structures. 2) For Gaussian RBNs, we additionally derive an analytic approximation, allowing for robust parameter optimisation and Bayesian inference. The capacity and diverse applications of RBNs are illustrated on two examples: In a quantitative evaluation on synthetic data, we demonstrate and discuss the advantage of RBNs for segmentation and tree induction from noisy sequences, compared to change point detection and hierarchical clustering. In an application to musical data, we approach the unsolved problem of hierarchical music analysis from the raw note level and compare our results to expert annotations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.

Builds on

17 of 90 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2020Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural Networkscited by 368
  3. 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
  4. 2019Learning Discrete Structures for Graph Neural Networkscited by 228
  5. 2013Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Datacited by 185
  6. 2019Compound Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars for Grammar Inductioncited by 76
  7. 2016Structure Learning in Graphical Modelingcited by 66
  8. 2018Dirichlet-based Gaussian Processes for Large-scale Calibrated Classificationcited by 50
  9. 2020Fast and Accurate Neural CRF Constituency Parsingcited by 50
  10. 2020Torch-Struct: Deep Structured Prediction Librarycited by 40
  11. 2019Conditional Sum-Product Networks: Imposing Structure on Deep Probabilistic Architecturescited by 24
  12. 2019Bayesian Learning of Sum-Product Networkscited by 24
5 more
  1. 2013Learning Bayesian Networks: A Unification for Discrete and Gaussian Domainscited by 21
  2. 2018Automatic Bayesian Density Analysiscited by 10
  3. 2014Guaranteed Scalable Learning of Latent Tree Modelscited by 4
  4. 2020Factor Graph Grammarscited by 4
  5. 2018Gaussian Mixture Latent Vector Grammarscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.