mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Elucidating Robust Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Corruption Pattern Estimation

arXiv 2111.01632 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robust learning methods aim to learn a clean target distribution from noisy and corrupted training data where a specific corruption pattern is often assumed a priori. Our proposed method can not only successfully learn the clean target distribution from a dirty dataset but also can estimate the underlying noise pattern. To this end, we leverage a mixture-of-experts model that can distinguish two different types of predictive uncertainty, aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. We show that the ability to estimate the uncertainty plays a significant role in elucidating the corruption patterns as these two objectives are tightly intertwined. We also present a novel validation scheme for evaluating the performance of the corruption pattern estimation. Our proposed method is extensively assessed in terms of both robustness and corruption pattern estimation through a number of domains, including computer vision and natural language processing.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  2. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  3. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  7. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  9. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  10. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  11. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  12. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
13 more
  1. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  2. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  3. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  4. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  5. 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
  6. 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
  7. 2020Confidence Scores Make Instance-dependent Label-noise Learning Possiblecited by 63
  8. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  9. 2021Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 62
  10. 2017Learning with Bounded Instance- and Label-dependent Label Noisecited by 57
  11. 2020Part-dependent Label Noise: Towards Instance-dependent Label Noisecited by 40
  12. 2019IMAE for Noise-Robust Learning: Mean Absolute Error Does Not Treat Examples Equally and Gradient Magnitude's Variance Matterscited by 33
  13. 2018Task Agnostic Robust Learning on Corrupt Outputs by Correlation-Guided Mixture Density Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Diagnosing Corruption-Induced Reliability Failures in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2023Benchmarking Robustness to Text-Guided Corruptions
  3. 2025Analysing the Robustness of Vision-Language-Models to Common Corruptions
  4. 2021Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025Robustness of Probabilistic Models to Low-Quality Data: A Multi-Perspective Analysis
  6. 2026BRUCE: Benchmarking Robustness Under Corruption Escalation for Scientific Vision-Language Reasoning
  7. 2023Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation
  8. 2024Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models