Analysing the Effect of Masking Length Distribution of MLM: An Evaluation Framework and Case Study on Chinese MRC Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine reading comprehension (MRC) is a challenging natural language processing (NLP) task. Recently, the emergence of pre-trained models (PTM) has brought this research field into a new era, in which the training objective plays a key role. The masked language model (MLM) is a self-supervised training objective that widely used in various PTMs. With the development of training objectives, many variants of MLM have been proposed, such as whole word masking, entity masking, phrase masking, span masking, and so on. In different MLM, the length of the masked tokens is different. Similarly, in different machine reading comprehension tasks, the length of the answer is also different, and the answer is often a word, phrase, or sentence. Thus, in MRC tasks with different answer lengths, whether the length of MLM is related to performance is a question worth studying. If this hypothesis is true, it can guide us how to pre-train the MLM model with a relatively suitable mask length distribution for MRC task. In this paper, we try to uncover how much of MLM's success in the machine reading comprehension tasks comes from the correlation between masking length distribution and answer length in MRC dataset. In order to address this issue, herein, (1) we propose four MRC tasks with different answer length distributions, namely short span extraction task, long span extraction task, short multiple-choice cloze task, long multiple-choice cloze task; (2) four Chinese MRC datasets are created for these tasks; (3) we also have pre-trained four masked language models according to the answer length distributions of these datasets; (4) ablation experiments are conducted on the datasets to verify our hypothesis. The experimental results demonstrate that our hypothesis is true.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2021.
Builds on
21 of 36 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integrationcited by 301
- 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 262
- 2019ERNIE 2.0: A Continual Pre-training Framework for Language Understandingcited by 230
- 2019Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilitiescited by 191
9 more
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 176
- 2020Perturbed Masking: Parameter-free Probing for Analyzing and Interpreting BERTcited by 109
- 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
- 2021Why Do Pretrained Language Models Help in Downstream Tasks? An Analysis of Head and Prompt Tuningcited by 82
- 2020Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Inductioncited by 47
- 2019Cloze-driven Pretraining of Self-attention Networkscited by 41
- 2020A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension: Tasks, Evaluation Metrics and Benchmark Datasetscited by 40
- 2020ERNIE-Gram: Pre-Training with Explicitly N-Gram Masked Language Modeling for Natural Language Understandingcited by 17
- 2020A Sentence Cloze Dataset for Chinese Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.