mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Information efficient learning of complexly structured preferences: Elicitation procedures and their application to decision making under uncertainty

arXiv 2110.12879 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2021cs.AI stat.MEcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we propose efficient methods for elicitation of complexly structured preferences and utilize these in problems of decision making under (severe) uncertainty. Based on the general framework introduced in Jansen, Schollmeyer and Augustin (2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason), we now design elicitation procedures and algorithms that enable decision makers to reveal their underlying preference system (i.e. two relations, one encoding the ordinal, the other the cardinal part of the preferences) while having to answer as few as possible simple ranking questions. Here, two different approaches are followed. The first approach directly utilizes the collected ranking data for obtaining the ordinal part of the preferences, while their cardinal part is constructed implicitly by measuring meta data on the decision maker's consideration times. In contrast, the second approach explicitly elicits also the cardinal part of the decision maker's preference system, however, only an approximate version of it. This approximation is obtained by additionally collecting labels of preference strength during the elicitation procedure. For both approaches, we give conditions under which they produce the decision maker's true preference system and investigate how their efficiency can be improved. For the latter purpose, besides data-free approaches, we also discuss ways for effectively guiding the elicitation procedure if data from previous elicitation rounds is available. Finally, we demonstrate how the proposed elicitation methods can be utilized in problems of decision under (severe) uncertainty. Precisely, we show that under certain conditions optimal decisions can be found without fully specifying the preference system.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2021.

Builds on

5 of 71 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 910
  2. 2013A Hybrid Approach to Reasoning with Partially Elicited Preference Modelscited by 2
  3. 2017Efficiently Discovering Locally Exceptional yet Globally Representative Subgroupscited by 2
  4. 2018Discovering Reliable Dependencies from Data: Hardness and Improved Algorithmscited by 1
  5. 2021Robust decision analysis under severe uncertainty and ambiguous tradeoffs: an invasive species case studycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

10 papers.