Deep Convolutional Autoencoders as Generic Feature Extractors in Seismological Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The idea of using a deep autoencoder to encode seismic waveform features and then use them in different seismological applications is appealing. In this paper, we designed tests to evaluate this idea of using autoencoders as feature extractors for different seismological applications, such as event discrimination (i.e., earthquake vs. noise waveforms, earthquake vs. explosion waveforms, and phase picking). These tests involve training an autoencoder, either undercomplete or overcomplete, on a large amount of earthquake waveforms, and then using the trained encoder as a feature extractor with subsequent application layers (either a fully connected layer, or a convolutional layer plus a fully connected layer) to make the decision. By comparing the performance of these newly designed models against the baseline models trained from scratch, we conclude that the autoencoder feature extractor approach may only perform well under certain conditions such as when the target problems require features to be similar to the autoencoder encoded features, when a relatively small amount of training data is available, and when certain model structures and training strategies are utilized. The model structure that works best in all these tests is an overcomplete autoencoder with a convolutional layer and a fully connected layer to make the estimation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2021.
Builds on
8 of 49 references.
References · 8
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 417
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learningcited by 209
- 2017Machine Learning for the Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 53
- 2018Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2018Universal Joint Feature Extraction for P300 EEG Classification using Multi-task Autoencodercited by 9
- 2020Semi-supervised source localization with deep generative modelingcited by 7
- 2019Discriminative Autoencoder for Feature Extraction: Application to Character Recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Predicting Wind-Driven Spatial Deposition through Simulated Color Images using Deep Autoencoderscited by 3
- 2024A Staged Deep Learning Approach to Spatial Refinement in 3D Temporal Atmospheric Transportcited by 2
- 2022Combining Deep Learning with Physics Based Features in Explosion-Earthquake Discriminationcited by 1
- 2025Automated Classification of Volcanic Earthquakes Using Transformer Encoders: Insights into Data Quality and Model Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2025Automated Classification of Volcanic Earthquakes Using Transformer Encoders: Insights into Data Quality and Model Interpretability2 Jul 2025
- 2024A Staged Deep Learning Approach to Spatial Refinement in 3D Temporal Atmospheric Transport14 Dec 2024
- 2022Combining Deep Learning with Physics Based Features in Explosion-Earthquake Discrimination12 Mar 2022
- 2022Predicting Wind-Driven Spatial Deposition through Simulated Color Images using Deep Autoencoders3 Feb 2022