On the Regularization of Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While much work has been devoted to understanding the implicit (and explicit) regularization of deep nonlinear networks in the supervised setting, this paper focuses on unsupervised learning, i.e., autoencoders are trained with the objective of reproducing the output from the input. We extend recent results [Jin et al. 2021] on unconstrained linear models and apply them to (1) nonlinear autoencoders and (2) constrained linear autoencoders, obtaining the following two results: first, we show that the unsupervised setting by itself induces strong additional regularization, i.e., a severe reduction in the model-capacity of the learned autoencoder: we derive that a deep nonlinear autoencoder cannot fit the training data more accurately than a linear autoencoder does if both models have the same dimensionality in their last hidden layer (and under a few additional assumptions). Our second contribution is concerned with the low-rank EDLAE model [Steck 2020], which is a linear autoencoder with a constraint on the diagonal of the learned low-rank parameter-matrix for improved generalization: we derive a closed-form approximation to the optimum of its non-convex training-objective, and empirically demonstrate that it is an accurate approximation across all model-ranks in our experiments on three well-known data sets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.
Builds on
19 of 36 references.
References · 19
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 310
- 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 256
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
- 2018Algorithmic Regularization in Learning Deep Homogeneous Models: Layers are Automatically Balancedcited by 177
- 2020Evaluation of Neural Architectures Trained with Square Loss vs Cross-Entropy in Classification Taskscited by 138
- 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 132
- 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
- 2020Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning May Not Be Explainable by Normscited by 119
- 2017Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networkscited by 109
7 more
- 2020Classification vs regression in overparameterized regimes: Does the loss function matter?cited by 97
- 2019Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Datacited by 94
- 2019RecVAE: a New Variational Autoencoder for Top-N Recommendations with Implicit Feedbackcited by 63
- 2020Theoretical Insights Into Multiclass Classification: A High-dimensional Asymptotic Viewcited by 32
- 2021Towards a Better Understanding of Linear Models for Recommendationcited by 18
- 2019High Dimensional Classification via Regularized and Unregularized Empirical Risk Minimization: Precise Error and Optimal Losscited by 9
- 2020Learning the Structure of Auto-Encoding Recommenderscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.