mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SLURP: Side Learning Uncertainty for Regression Problems

arXiv 2110.11182 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It has become critical for deep learning algorithms to quantify their output uncertainties to satisfy reliability constraints and provide accurate results. Uncertainty estimation for regression has received less attention than classification due to the more straightforward standardized output of the latter class of tasks and their high importance. However, regression problems are encountered in a wide range of applications in computer vision. We propose SLURP, a generic approach for regression uncertainty estimation via a side learner that exploits the output and the intermediate representations generated by the main task model. We test SLURP on two critical regression tasks in computer vision: monocular depth and optical flow estimation. In addition, we conduct exhaustive benchmarks comprising transfer to different datasets and the addition of aleatoric noise. The results show that our proposal is generic and readily applicable to various regression problems and has a low computational cost with respect to existing solutions.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

28 of 51 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,707
  3. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,516
  4. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,435
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  6. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,862
  8. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,371
  9. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,340
  10. 2014Depth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Networkcited by 1,269
  11. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,057
  12. 2017PWC-Net: CNNs for Optical Flow Using Pyramid, Warping, and Cost Volumecited by 967
16 more
  1. 2016FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of Optical Flow Estimation with Deep Networkscited by 782
  2. 2019From Big to Small: Multi-Scale Local Planar Guidance for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 380
  3. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 371
  4. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  5. 2017Sparsity Invariant CNNscited by 325
  6. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 209
  7. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 185
  8. 2019Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Visioncited by 182
  9. 2020On the uncertainty of self-supervised monocular depth estimationcited by 182
  10. 2016Richer Convolutional Features for Edge Detectioncited by 142
  11. 2018Uncertainty Estimates and Multi-Hypotheses Networks for Optical Flowcited by 135
  12. 2021DEUP: Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Predictioncited by 102
  13. 2018Model Adaptation with Synthetic and Real Data for Semantic Dense Foggy Scene Understandingcited by 98
  14. 2018Models Matter, So Does Training: An Empirical Study of CNNs for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 94
  15. 2018Lightweight Probabilistic Deep Networkscited by 77
  16. 2013Tractable Inference for Complex Stochastic Processescited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

12 papers.