Inverse Optimal Control Adapted to the Noise Characteristics of the Human Sensorimotor System
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computational level explanations based on optimal feedback control with signal-dependent noise have been able to account for a vast array of phenomena in human sensorimotor behavior. However, commonly a cost function needs to be assumed for a task and the optimality of human behavior is evaluated by comparing observed and predicted trajectories. Here, we introduce inverse optimal control with signal-dependent noise, which allows inferring the cost function from observed behavior. To do so, we formalize the problem as a partially observable Markov decision process and distinguish between the agent's and the experimenter's inference problems. Specifically, we derive a probabilistic formulation of the evolution of states and belief states and an approximation to the propagation equation in the linear-quadratic Gaussian problem with signal-dependent noise. We extend the model to the case of partial observability of state variables from the point of view of the experimenter. We show the feasibility of the approach through validation on synthetic data and application to experimental data. Our approach enables recovering the costs and benefits implicit in human sequential sensorimotor behavior, thereby reconciling normative and descriptive approaches in a computational framework.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.
Builds on
11 of 65 references.
References · 11
- 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
- 2017Learning Robust Rewards with Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
- 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 459
- 2016Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimizationcited by 406
- 2020Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 265
- 2020Online Bayesian Goal Inference for Boundedly-Rational Planning Agentscited by 68
- 2021Scalable Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 56
- 2018Where Do You Think You're Going?: Inferring Beliefs about Dynamics from Behaviorcited by 40
- 2018Improving the Flexibility and Robustness of Model-Based Derivative-Free Optimization Solverscited by 9
- 2014Active Sensing as Bayes-Optimal Sequential Decision Makingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Highly Efficient Self-Adaptive Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2022Reinforcement Learning with Non-Exponential Discountingcited by 7
- 2023Probabilistic inverse optimal control for non-linear partially observable systems disentangles perceptual uncertainty and behavioral costscited by 1
- 2024Inverse decision-making using neural amortized Bayesian actorscited by 0
- 2024Inverse decision-making using neural amortized Bayesian actors4 Sep 2024
- 2024Highly Efficient Self-Adaptive Reward Shaping for Reinforcement Learning6 Aug 2024
- 2023Probabilistic inverse optimal control for non-linear partially observable systems disentangles perceptual uncertainty and behavioral costs29 Mar 2023
- 2022Reinforcement Learning with Non-Exponential Discounting27 Sep 2022