Surrogate Representation Learning with Isometric Mapping for Gray-box Graph Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gray-box graph attacks aim at disrupting the performance of the victim model by using inconspicuous attacks with limited knowledge of the victim model. The parameters of the victim model and the labels of the test nodes are invisible to the attacker. To obtain the gradient on the node attributes or graph structure, the attacker constructs an imaginary surrogate model trained under supervision. However, there is a lack of discussion on the training of surrogate models and the robustness of provided gradient information. The general node classification model loses the topology of the nodes on the graph, which is, in fact, an exploitable prior for the attacker. This paper investigates the effect of representation learning of surrogate models on the transferability of gray-box graph adversarial attacks. To reserve the topology in the surrogate embedding, we propose Surrogate Representation Learning with Isometric Mapping (SRLIM). By using Isometric mapping method, our proposed SRLIM can constrain the topological structure of nodes from the input layer to the embedding space, that is, to maintain the similarity of nodes in the propagation process. Experiments prove the effectiveness of our approach through the improvement in the performance of the adversarial attacks generated by the gradient-based attacker in untargeted poisoning gray-box setups.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2021.
Builds on
19 of 33 references.
References · 19
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2018Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networks for Graph Datacited by 395
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 350
- 2018Session-based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 312
- 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 300
- 2019Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Meta Learningcited by 261
- 2019Topology Attack and Defense for Graph Neural Networks: An Optimization Perspectivecited by 196
- 2018Adversarial Attacks on Node Embeddings via Graph Poisoningcited by 109
- 2016Hiding Individuals and Communities in a Social Networkcited by 77
7 more
- 2020Towards More Practical Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networkscited by 76
- 2019A Restricted Black-box Adversarial Framework Towards Attacking Graph Embedding Modelscited by 68
- 2019Attacking Graph-based Classification via Manipulating the Graph Structurecited by 53
- 2019Attacking Graph Convolutional Networks via Rewiringcited by 32
- 2018Attack Graph Convolutional Networks by Adding Fake Nodescited by 26
- 2020Adversarial Attack on Community Detection by Hiding Individualscited by 20
- 2021Adversarial Attack on Network Embeddings via Supervised Network Poisoningcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformers with Token Gradient Regularizationcited by 42
- 2023Towards Reasonable Budget Allocation in Untargeted Graph Structure Attacks via Gradient Debiascited by 16
- 2022Are Gradients on Graph Structure Reliable in Gray-box Attacks?cited by 10
- 2024Minimum Topology Attacks for Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2024Minimum Topology Attacks for Graph Neural Networks5 Mar 2024
- 2023Towards Reasonable Budget Allocation in Untargeted Graph Structure Attacks via Gradient Debias29 Mar 2023
- 2023Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformers with Token Gradient Regularization28 Mar 2023
- 2022Are Gradients on Graph Structure Reliable in Gray-box Attacks?7 Aug 2022