Evaluating and Improving Interactions with Hazy Oracles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many AI systems integrate sensor inputs, world knowledge, and human-provided information to perform inference. While such systems often treat the human input as flawless, humans are better thought of as hazy oracles whose input may be ambiguous or outside of the AI system's understanding. In such situations it makes sense for the AI system to defer its inference while it disambiguates the human-provided information by, for example, asking the human to rephrase the query. Though this approach has been considered in the past, current work is typically limited to application-specific methods and non-standardized human experiments. We instead introduce and formalize a general notion of deferred inference. Using this formulation, we then propose a novel evaluation centered around the Deferred Error Volume (DEV) metric, which explicitly considers the tradeoff between error reduction and the additional human effort required to achieve it. We demonstrate this new formalization and an innovative deferred inference method on the disparate tasks of Single-Target Video Object Tracking and Referring Expression Comprehension, ultimately reducing error by up to 48% without any change to the underlying model or its parameters.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2021.
Builds on
26 of 50 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,027
- 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 904
- 2018VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind Peoplecited by 858
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2016Visual Dialogcited by 377
- 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 350
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
- 2015A Novel Performance Evaluation Methodology for Single-Target Trackerscited by 113
14 more
- 2018Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifierscited by 113
- 2019BayesOD: A Bayesian Approach for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Object Detectorscited by 68
- 2017Interactively Picking Real-World Objects with Unconstrained Spoken Language Instructionscited by 62
- 2018Interactive Visual Grounding of Referring Expressions for Human-Robot Interactioncited by 56
- 2018Interactive Full Image Segmentation by Considering All Regions Jointlycited by 34
- 2019Why Does a Visual Question Have Different Answers?cited by 34
- 2021Composing Pick-and-Place Tasks By Grounding Languagecited by 20
- 2017The Promise of Premise: Harnessing Question Premises in Visual Question Answeringcited by 11
- 2017Learning Intelligent Dialogs for Bounding Box Annotationcited by 9
- 2016Click Carving: Segmenting Objects in Video with Point Clickscited by 8
- 2019Leveraging Uncertainty in Deep Learning for Selective Classificationcited by 4
- 2017Click Here: Human-Localized Keypoints as Guidance for Viewpoint Estimationcited by 3
- 2019Panoptic Image Annotation with a Collaborative Assistantcited by 3
- 2020Ground-truth or DAER: Selective Re-query of Secondary Informationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.