On the Effect of Selfie Beautification Filters on Face Detection and Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Beautification and augmented reality filters are very popular in applications that use selfie images captured with smartphones or personal devices. However, they can distort or modify biometric features, severely affecting the capability of recognizing individuals' identity or even detecting the face. Accordingly, we address the effect of such filters on the accuracy of automated face detection and recognition. The social media image filters studied either modify the image contrast or illumination or occlude parts of the face with for example artificial glasses or animal noses. We observe that the effect of some of these filters is harmful both to face detection and identity recognition, specially if they obfuscate the eye or (to a lesser extent) the nose. To counteract such effect, we develop a method to reconstruct the applied manipulation with a modified version of the U-NET segmentation network. This is observed to contribute to a better face detection and recognition accuracy. From a recognition perspective, we employ distance measures and trained machine learning algorithms applied to features extracted using a ResNet-34 network trained to recognize faces. We also evaluate if incorporating filtered images to the training set of machine learning approaches are beneficial for identity recognition. Our results show good recognition when filters do not occlude important landmarks, specially the eyes (identification accuracy >99%, EER<2%). The combined effect of the proposed approaches also allow to mitigate the effect produced by filters that occlude parts of the face, achieving an identification accuracy of >92% with the majority of perturbations evaluated, and an EER <8%. Although there is room for improvement, when neither U-NET reconstruction nor training with filtered images is applied, the accuracy with filters that severely occlude the eye is <72% (identification) and >12% (EER)
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2021.
Builds on
13 of 51 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
- 2020A survey of face recognition techniques under occlusioncited by 38
- 2020The Effect of Wearing a Mask on Face Recognition Performance: an Exploratory Studycited by 26
- 2018A Survey on Periocular Biometrics Researchcited by 20
- 2020SqueezeFacePoseNet: Lightweight Face Verification Across Different Poses for Mobile Platformscited by 9
- 2017Demography-based Facial Retouching Detection using Subclass Supervised Sparse Autoencodercited by 8
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Deep Learning for Iris Recognition: A Surveycited by 25
- 2024HumanVLM: Foundation for Human-Scene Vision-Language Modelcited by 8
- 2025Diffusion-based Facial Aesthetics Enhancement with 3D Structure Guidancecited by 4
- 2022LFW-Beautified: A Dataset of Face Images with Beautification and Augmented Reality Filterscited by 2
- 2022OpenFilter: A Framework to Democratize Research Access to Social Media AR Filterscited by 2
- 2022IMAGINE: An Integrated Model of Artificial Intelligence-Mediated Communication Effectscited by 0
- 2025Deceptive Beauty: Evaluating the Impact of Beauty Filters on Deepfake and Morphing Attack Detectioncited by 0
- 2025Exploring Complementarity and Explainability in CNNs for Periocular Verification Across Acquisition Distancescited by 0
- 2025Leveraging Large-Scale Face Datasets for Deep Periocular Recognition via Ocular Croppingcited by 0
- 2026Periocular Soft Biometrics: A Survey and Applications to Multimedia Forensics and Disinformation Detectioncited by 0
- 2026Periocular Soft Biometrics: A Survey and Applications to Multimedia Forensics and Disinformation Detection10 Aug 2026
- 2025Leveraging Large-Scale Face Datasets for Deep Periocular Recognition via Ocular Cropping30 Oct 2025
- 2025Exploring Complementarity and Explainability in CNNs for Periocular Verification Across Acquisition Distances30 Oct 2025
- 2025Deceptive Beauty: Evaluating the Impact of Beauty Filters on Deepfake and Morphing Attack Detection17 Sep 2025
- 2025Diffusion-based Facial Aesthetics Enhancement with 3D Structure Guidance18 Mar 2025
- 2024HumanVLM: Foundation for Human-Scene Vision-Language Model5 Nov 2024
- 2022IMAGINE: An Integrated Model of Artificial Intelligence-Mediated Communication Effects13 Dec 2022
- 2022Deep Learning for Iris Recognition: A Survey12 Oct 2022
- 2022OpenFilter: A Framework to Democratize Research Access to Social Media AR Filters19 Jul 2022
- 2022LFW-Beautified: A Dataset of Face Images with Beautification and Augmented Reality Filters11 Mar 2022