Centroid Approximation for Bootstrap: Improving Particle Quality at Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bootstrap is a principled and powerful frequentist statistical tool for uncertainty quantification. Unfortunately, standard bootstrap methods are computationally intensive due to the need of drawing a large i.i.d. bootstrap sample to approximate the ideal bootstrap distribution; this largely hinders their application in large-scale machine learning, especially deep learning problems. In this work, we propose an efficient method to explicitly optimize a small set of high quality ``centroid'' points to better approximate the ideal bootstrap distribution. We achieve this by minimizing a simple objective function that is asymptotically equivalent to the Wasserstein distance to the ideal bootstrap distribution. This allows us to provide an accurate estimation of uncertainty with a small number of bootstrap centroids, outperforming the naive i.i.d. sampling approach. Empirically, we show that our method can boost the performance of bootstrap in a variety of applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2021.
Builds on
32 of 67 references.
References · 32
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
20 more
- 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 498
- 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 349
- 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 341
- 2018Deep Bayesian Bandits Showdown: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian Deep Networks for Thompson Samplingcited by 166
- 2018Out-of-Distribution Detection Using an Ensemble of Self Supervised Leave-out Classifierscited by 126
- 2018High-Quality Prediction Intervals for Deep Learning: A Distribution-Free, Ensembled Approachcited by 117
- 2020Masksembles for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 88
- 2019Adaptive, Distribution-Free Prediction Intervals for Deep Networkscited by 56
- 2020Predictive Inference Is Free with the Jackknife+-after-Bootstrapcited by 55
- 2018Stein Pointscited by 43
- 2019Bootstrapping Upper Confidence Boundcited by 36
- 2019Sparse Variational Inference: Bayesian Coresets from Scratchcited by 28
- 2020Prediction Intervals: Split Normal Mixture from Quality-Driven Deep Ensemblescited by 14
- 2017Variational Gaussian Dropout is not Bayesiancited by 13
- 2016An Efficient Minibatch Acceptance Test for Metropolis-Hastingscited by 11
- 2018Wasserstein Measure Coresetscited by 10
- 2020Bayesian Bootstrap Spike-and-Slab LASSOcited by 8
- 2019Mini-batch Metropolis-Hastings MCMC with Reversible SGLD Proposalcited by 6
- 2020Simultaneous Inference for Massive Data: Distributed Bootstrapcited by 4
- 2020Asymptotics of the Empirical Bootstrap Method Beyond Asymptotic Normalitycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.