Performance, Successes and Limitations of Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation of Multiple Defects in Transmission Electron Micrographs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we perform semantic segmentation of multiple defect types in electron microscopy images of irradiated FeCrAl alloys using a deep learning Mask Regional Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) model. We conduct an in-depth analysis of key model performance statistics, with a focus on quantities such as predicted distributions of defect shapes, defect sizes, and defect areal densities relevant to informing modeling and understanding of irradiated Fe-based materials properties. To better understand the performance and present limitations of the model, we provide examples of useful evaluation tests which include a suite of random splits, and dataset size-dependent and domain-targeted cross validation tests. Overall, we find that the current model is a fast, effective tool for automatically characterizing and quantifying multiple defect types in microscopy images, with a level of accuracy on par with human domain expert labelers. More specifically, the model can achieve average defect identification F1 scores as high as 0.8, and, based on random cross validation, have low overall average (+/- standard deviation) defect size and density percentage errors of 7.3 (+/- 3.8)% and 12.7 (+/- 5.3)%, respectively. Further, our model predicts the expected material hardening to within 10-20 MPa (about 10% of total hardening), which is about the same error level as experiments. Our targeted evaluation tests also suggest the best path toward improving future models is not expanding existing databases with more labeled images but instead data additions that target weak points of the model domain, such as images from different microscopes, imaging conditions, irradiation environments, and alloy types. Finally, we discuss the first phase of an effort to provide an easy-to-use, open-source object detection tool to the broader community for identifying defects in new images.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2021.
Builds on
13 of 54 references.
References · 13
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
- 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
- 2017Deep Learning for Computational Chemistrycited by 38
- 2020Overview: Computer vision and machine learning for microstructural characterization and analysiscited by 22
- 2018DLHub: Model and Data Serving for Sciencecited by 17
- 2021A Deep Learning Based Automatic Defect Analysis Framework for In-situ TEM Ion Irradiationscited by 10
- 2021Multi defect detection and analysis of electron microscopy images with deep learningcited by 9
- 2017ChainerCV: a Library for Deep Learning in Computer Visioncited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.