mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying Local Specialization in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2110.08058 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A neural network is locally specialized to the extent that parts of its computational graph (i.e. structure) can be abstractly represented as performing some comprehensible sub-task relevant to the overall task (i.e. functionality). Are modern deep neural networks locally specialized? How can this be quantified? In this paper, we consider the problem of taking a neural network whose neurons are partitioned into clusters, and quantifying how functionally specialized the clusters are. We propose two proxies for this: importance, which reflects how crucial sets of neurons are to network performance; and coherence, which reflects how consistently their neurons associate with features of the inputs. To measure these proxies, we develop a set of statistical methods based on techniques conventionally used to interpret individual neurons. We apply the proxies to partitionings generated by spectrally clustering a graph representation of the network's neurons with edges determined either by network weights or correlations of activations. We show that these partitionings, even ones based only on weights (i.e. strictly from non-runtime analysis), reveal groups of neurons that are important and coherent. These results suggest that graph-based partitioning can reveal local specialization and that statistical methods can be used to automatedly screen for sets of neurons that can be understood abstractly.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.

Builds on

18 of 46 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  5. 2019Recurrent Independent Mechanismscited by 219
  6. 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
  7. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 140
  8. 2017Learning Independent Causal Mechanismscited by 104
  9. 2017Building machines that adapt and compute like brainscited by 99
  10. 2018On the importance of single directions for generalizationcited by 99
  11. 2020Graph Structure of Neural Networkscited by 67
  12. 2018Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Neural Computationcited by 62
6 more
  1. 2018Modular meta-learningcited by 51
  2. 2018Revisiting the Importance of Individual Units in CNNs via Ablationcited by 32
  3. 2021Clusterability in Neural Networkscited by 23
  4. 2018Interpreting Layered Neural Networks via Hierarchical Modular Representationcited by 11
  5. 2019Frivolous Units: Wider Networks Are Not Really That Widecited by 10
  6. 2018Deep learning systems as complex networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

10 papers.