mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LAGr: Labeling Aligned Graphs for Improving Systematic Generalization in Semantic Parsing

arXiv 2110.07572 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic parsing is the task of producing a structured meaning representation for natural language utterances or questions. Recent research has pointed out that the commonly-used sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) semantic parsers struggle to generalize systematically, i.e. to handle examples that require recombining known knowledge in novel settings. In this work, we show that better systematic generalization can be achieved by producing the meaning representation (MR) directly as a graph and not as a sequence. To this end we propose LAGr, the Labeling Aligned Graphs algorithm that produces semantic parses by predicting node and edge labels for a complete multi-layer input-aligned graph. The strongly-supervised LAGr algorithm requires aligned graphs as inputs, whereas weakly-supervised LAGr infers alignments for originally unaligned target graphs using an approximate MAP inference procedure. On the COGS and CFQ compositional generalization benchmarks the strongly- and weakly- supervised LAGr algorithms achieve significant improvements upon the baseline seq2seq parsers.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2021.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  6. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
  7. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
  8. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
  9. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  10. 2021The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
  11. 2018Coarse-to-Fine Decoding for Neural Semantic Parsingcited by 110
  12. 2020Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing: Pre-training vs. Specialized Architecturescited by 95
11 more
  1. 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
  2. 2021Making Transformers Solve Compositional Taskscited by 72
  3. 2019CLOSURE: Assessing Systematic Generalization of CLEVR Modelscited by 63
  4. 2021Meta-Learning to Compositionally Generalizecited by 62
  5. 2016Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representationscited by 55
  6. 2021Unlocking Compositional Generalization in Pre-trained Models Using Intermediate Representationscited by 55
  7. 2018AMR Parsing as Graph Prediction with Latent Alignmentcited by 36
  8. 2020Compositional Generalization via Semantic Taggingcited by 32
  9. 2021Learning Algebraic Recombination for Compositional Generalizationcited by 31
  10. 2020Hierarchical Poset Decoding for Compositional Generalization in Languagecited by 26
  11. 2021Structured Reordering for Modeling Latent Alignments in Sequence Transductioncited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

7 papers.